Judgment No. 2100
Decision
THE COMPLAINT IS DISMISSED.
Consideration 13
Extract:
"The Tribunal points out that an allegation of harassment must be borne out by specific facts, the burden of proof being on the person who pleads it, and that an accumulation of events over time may be cited to support an allegation of harassment (see for example Judgment 2067, [...], under 5 and 16)."
Reference(s)
Jugement(s) TAOIT: 2067
Keywords
moral injury; evidence; burden of proof; respect for dignity
Consideration 15
Extract:
"As to the remarks [the complainant] attributes to the chair of the Staff Union Committee and the quarrel she says arose between herself and a member of the staff union about union matters, the Tribunal endorses the Director's response to her that "the administration could not act without interfering in union matters"."
Keywords
moral injury; organisation's duties; staff union; staff union activity
Dissenting opinion
Extract:
A dissenting opinion by Judge Rondón de Sansó is attached to the judgment.
Keywords
dissenting opinion
|