Judgment No. 216
Decision
THE COMPLAINT IS DISMISSED.
Consideration 2
Extract:
Vide Judgment 219, consideration 2.
Reference(s)
ILOAT Judgment(s): 219
Keywords
family allowance; dependent child; parents separated
Consideration 2
Extract:
Vide Judgment 219, consideration 2.
Reference(s)
ILOAT Judgment(s): 219
Keywords
dependent child; definition
Consideration 2
Extract:
Vide Judgment 219, consideration 2.
Reference(s)
ILOAT Judgment(s): 219
Keywords
family allowance; dependent child; parents separated; condition; right
Consideration 2
Extract:
The complainant recognises "that he is not entitled to an allowance as head of the family on account of the payments he makes on behalf of the children of his first marriage, who are in their mother's custody. It follows that he cannot claim the child allowance either, since the grant of both allowances depends on the fulfillment of the same condition."
Keywords
allowance; family allowance; dependent child; parents separated; condition
Consideration 1
Extract:
"The internal procedure and the procedure before the Administrative Tribunal are connected, the former being a necessary prelude to the latter. Subject to any provisions to the contrary in its own Statute, therefore, the Administrative Tribunal is competent to hear any cases which are referable to the internal appeals body."
Keywords
internal appeals body; competence; tribunal; competence of tribunal
Consideration 3
Extract:
Vide Judgment 219, consideration 3.
Reference(s)
ILOAT Judgment(s): 219
Keywords
allowance; dependent child; parents separated; education expenses; condition; right
Consideration 2
Extract:
Vide Judgment 219, consideration 2.
Reference(s)
ILOAT Judgment(s): 219
Keywords
interpretation; dependant; dependent child; criteria
|