Judgment No. 240
Decision
1. There is no reason to consider the request for interpretation. 2. Mr. Hopkirk's accessory claims for relief are dismissed.
Considerations
Extract:
"[The judgment in question] is clear, suffers from no ambiguity and presents no difficulty of interpretation. The Tribunal therefore sees no reason to interpret that judgment."
Reference(s)
ILOAT Judgment(s): 211
Keywords
application for interpretation
Considerations
Extract:
"A request for interpretation of a judgment by the Administrative Tribunal is receivable only if the operative part of the judgment gives rise to uncertainty or ambiguity about its meaning or purport."
Reference(s)
ILOAT Judgment(s): 211
Keywords
application for interpretation; receivability of the complaint; condition
|