Exception (113,-666)

You searched for:
Keywords: Exception
Total judgments found: 212

< previous | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11

• Judgment 82

  
  14th Session, 1965
  International Telecommunication Union
  Extracts: EN, FR
  Full Judgment Text: EN, FR

  Consideration 5

  Extract:

  "In accordance with a well-established and generally recognised principle of law, any judgment compelling one party to pay to the other party a sum of money implies, in itself, the obligation to pay that sum without delay. It could be otherwise only in the event that the judgment expressly mentioned that this sum would be payable only at a later date and where the Statutes of the court concerned make provision for the right to appeal against the judgments delivered by it and formally state that exercise of that right of appeal carries suspensory effect on execution of those judgments."

  Reference(s)

  ILOAT Judgment(s): 61
  

  Keywords:

  delay in payment; exception; execution of judgment; judgment of the tribunal; organisation's duties; suspensory effects; time limit;
  

  
  
  

• Judgment 60

  
  10th Session, 1962
  World Health Organization
  Extracts: EN, FR
  Full Judgment Text: EN, FR

  Consideration 1

  Extract:

  "The Tribunal records the fact that the organization complied with complainant's submissions. In respect of that complaint, the complainant is entitled to costs."

  Keywords:

  case pending; costs; exception; settlement out of court;
  

  
  
  

• Judgment 53

  
  9th Session, 1961
  World Health Organization
  Extracts: EN, FR
  Full Judgment Text: EN, FR

  Consideration 9

  Extract:

  The complainant's claim for damages was well-founded. Compensation was paid to him after filing, but before the complaint was heard by the Tribunal. The complainant is entitled to costs. "As the Tribunal does not award costs to defendant organizations, the above-mentioned costs cannot be set off against costs in respect of the mistaken claim for transportation expenses withdrawn by the complainant after the submission of the organization's reply."

  Keywords:

  case pending; compensation; costs; exception; offer; organisation; settlement out of court;
  

  
  
  

• Judgment 40

  
  8th Session, 1960
  International Labour Organization
  Extracts: EN, FR
  Full Judgment Text: EN, FR

  Consideration 6

  Extract:

  The Tribunal is bound by the time limit of 90 days laid down for the lodging of complaints in Article VII, paragraph 2, of the Statute of the Tribunal. "Article 18 of the Rules of court authorises the Tribunal to extend only those time limits provided in the Rules and not those provided in the Statute."

  Reference(s)

  ILOAT reference: ARTICLE VII, PARAGRAPH 2, OF THE STATUTE;
  ARTICLE 18 OF THE RULES
  
  

  Keywords:

  complaint; enforcement; exception; iloat statute; new time limit; receivability of the complaint; time bar; time limit;
  

  
  
  

• Judgment 33

  
  7th Session, 1958
  United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization
  Extracts: EN, FR
  Full Judgment Text: EN, FR

  Considerations

  Extract:

  The offer to pay the complainant compensation for the moral and material prejudice he suffered equivalent to six months' salary together with allowances has been maintained before the Tribunal; "the fact that the Director-General admitted the principle of granting compensation to the complainant in respect of the prejudice caused to him was such as to lead the complainant to file his complaint; [...] taking into account the particular circumstances of the case it appears justified that, as an exceptional measure, the complainant be granted compensation by way of participation in his costs."

  Keywords:

  acceptance; compensation; costs; exception; injury; material injury; moral injury; offer; organisation; settlement out of court; tribunal;
  

  
  
  

• Judgment 25

  
  6th Session, 1957
  World Health Organization
  Extracts: EN, FR
  Full Judgment Text: EN, FR

  Consideration (C)

  Extract:

  "The opinion expressed by the Headquarters Board of Inquiry and Appeal concerning 'the unfortunate mishandling of the various steps taken in this case' was likely to encourage the complainant to submit his complaint to the Tribunal. [...] Having regard to the particular circumstances of the case, it appears justified, as an exceptional measure and without contravening the jurisprudence of the Tribunal, to grant the complainant an indemnity as a share in the costs incurred by him."

  Keywords:

  costs; exception; negligence; organisation;
  

  
  
  

• Judgment 21

  
  5th Session, 1955
  United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization
  Extracts: EN, FR
  Full Judgment Text: EN, FR

  Consideration on receivability

  Extract:

  "Whereas the complaint was not submitted within the period of time of 90 days provided in the Regulations running from the date on which the decision impugned was taken [...], such was due to the transfer of the complainant to hospital [...] the complainant could only take cognizance of this decision at the conclusion of her hospitalization [...]. She brought her complaint in due form within ninety days from that date [...]. The organization does not [...] plead non-receivability following the late notification of the complaint; the delay is clearly due to vis major".

  Keywords:

  complaint; exception; force majeure; health reasons; receivability of the complaint; time bar; time limit;
  

  
  
  

• Judgment 16

  
  5th Session, 1955
  International Institute of Intellectual Co-operation
  Extracts: EN, FR
  Full Judgment Text: EN, FR

  Consideration (D)

  Extract:

  "In strict law, the complainant was entitled to receive the indemnity provided for [...] but [...] her complaint submitted today is clearly out of time [...]. The Tribunal expresses however the wish that, respecting equity, the [organisation] accord to the complainant the indemnity provided for" [the Tribunal declares that in law, the action is unfounded and dismisses the claims of the complainant.]

  Keywords:

  complaint; equity; exception; receivability of the complaint; time bar;
  

  
  
  

• Judgment 14

  
  4th Session, 1954
  Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
  Extracts: EN, FR
  Full Judgment Text: EN, FR

  Considerations

  Extract:

  "The judge is bound to observe strictly the rules of law and can have recourse to equity only in the event of lack of clarity of the text or silence of the Regulations."

  Keywords:

  applicable law; enforcement; equity; exception; general principle; no provision;
  

  
  
  

• Judgment 12

  
  4th Session, 1954
  International Labour Organization
  Extracts: EN, FR
  Full Judgment Text: EN, FR

  Consideration 11

  Extract:

  The provision to which the complainant refers "states expressly that the Director-General may retain an official in service until he reaches the age of 65 years but [...] it grants the Director-General discretionary power to decide in which cases exception may be justified."

  Keywords:

  age limit; contract; discretion; exception; extension beyond retirement age; fixed-term; non-renewal of contract; retirement;
  

  
  
  

• Judgment .19

  
  Sessions of the Administrative Tribunal of the League of Nations, 1946
  League of Nations
  Extracts: EN, FR
  Full Judgment Text: EN, FR

  Judgment keywords

  Keywords:

  delay; equity; exception; receivability of the complaint; reinstatement;
  

  
  
  

• Judgment .16

  
  Sessions of the Administrative Tribunal of the League of Nations, 1946
  League of Nations
  Extracts: EN, FR
  Full Judgment Text: EN, FR

  Judgment keywords

  Keywords:

  delay; exception; receivability of the complaint;
  

< previous | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11