|
|
|
|
Interlocutory order (135, 136, 137,-666)
You searched for:
Keywords: Interlocutory order
Total judgments found: 25
< previous | 1, 2
Judgment 557
50th Session, 1983
International Labour Organization
Extracts: EN,
FR
Full Judgment Text: EN,
FR
Considerations 3(C) and 4(C)
Extract:
The complainant is seeking the disclosure of all confidential minutes exchanged between the units of the administration. The organisation "maintains that there are no secret minutes besides those which have been filed in the dossier. The Tribunal accepts this, and [the relevant claim] therefore fails."
Keywords:
cause of action; confidential evidence; disclosure of evidence; interlocutory order; no cause of action; order; request by a party;
Judgment 556
50th Session, 1983
International Labour Organization
Extracts: EN,
FR
Full Judgment Text: EN,
FR
Consideration 4
Extract:
The complainant is not entitled to consult any record of discussion by the Selection Board. "Members of selection boards would not feel free to discuss candidates independently in future if they were at risk of having their personal views divulged."
Keywords:
competition; confidential evidence; disclosure of evidence; interlocutory order; order; report; request by a party; selection board; selection procedure;
Consideration 2
Extract:
Article 19 of the Rules of court "empowers the President to make such orders only in the interval between sessions. Thus when in session the Tribunal itself will order measures of investigation in accordance with Article 11(1) of its Rules."
Reference(s)
ILOAT reference: ARTICLES 11 AND 19 OF THE RULES
Keywords:
competence of tribunal; iloat statute; inquiry; interlocutory order; investigation; order; submissions;
Judgment 141
22nd Session, 1969
European Organization for Nuclear Research
Extracts: EN,
FR
Full Judgment Text: EN,
FR
Interlocutory Order
Extract:
The Tribunal orders a medical examination. "The organization shall advance the cost of the expert examination and [the complainant's] expenses in submitting himself for the examination. The amount of these advances shall be determined by order of the Vice-President of the Tribunal."
Keywords:
cost of expert inquiry; expert inquiry; interlocutory order; medical examination; order;
Judgment 125
20th Session, 1968
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Extracts: EN,
FR
Full Judgment Text: EN,
FR
Consideration 1
Extract:
The organization based its conclusions on letters and the contents thereof "as evidence against the complainant". The complainant is accordingly "entitled to see the letters; and it is not enough that he should be provided with extracts or summaries of such parts of the letters as the organization considers to be relevant." The organization has admitted that passages have been omitted relating to extraneous subjects or which the organization considers confidential, the reasons for any such omissions having been given. If the Tribunal decides to examine the omitted passages, "the complete letters will [...] be produced only to the Tribunal itself and will not be shown to the complainant" unless the Tribunal so decides.
Keywords:
appraisal of evidence; confidential evidence; disclosure of evidence; interlocutory order; organisation; right to reply;
Judgment 57
10th Session, 1962
World Health Organization
Extracts: EN,
FR
Full Judgment Text: EN,
FR
Preamble and Material Facts
Extract:
Considering the complaint and the reply of the organization to the preliminary conclusion put forward in the said complaint, whereby the complainant requests that the Tribunal "should order the publication of the [document] to be suspended pending a judgment on the legality of the decision impugned. in view of their urgency and their contents, the preliminary conclusions call for an immediate decision."
Keywords:
interlocutory order; publication; refusal; tribunal;
< previous | 1, 2
|
|
|
|
|