Submissions (142, 143, 144, 145, 146, 147, 149, 150, 151, 152, 153, 154, 155, 156, 157, 159,-666)

You searched for:
Keywords: Submissions
Total judgments found: 49

< previous | 1, 2, 3

• Judgment 721

  
  58th Session, 1986
  European Patent Organisation
  Extracts: EN, FR
  Full Judgment Text: EN, FR

  Consideration 3

  Extract:

  "The defendant has the duty to enable the court to give a full ruling on the case before it. [...] The EPO was bound to address properly the issues of fact and of law raised by the complainant. Since it has not the Tribunal will accept the complainant's allegations of fact".

  Keywords:

  consequence; organisation; organisation's duties; reply; submissions;
  

  
  
  

• Judgment 595

  
  51st Session, 1983
  World Health Organization
  Extracts: EN, FR
  Full Judgment Text: EN, FR

  Consideration 2

  Extract:

  "The purpose of the procedural rules the Tribunal applies is to enable the parties not only to submit full pleadings but also to hold an exchange of briefs in which they enjoy complete freedom of speech. [...] As a rule the Tribunal allows each side to file no more than two briefs and closes the written proceedings after the defendant has filed the surrejoinder. only in exceptional cases does it admit further material."

  Keywords:

  additional written submissions; closure of written proceedings; exception; procedure before the tribunal; submissions;
  

  
  
  

• Judgment 574

  
  51st Session, 1983
  European Patent Organisation
  Extracts: EN, FR
  Full Judgment Text: EN, FR

  Consideration 3

  Extract:

  "The Tribunal observes that the defendant is under a duty to enable the court to render a complete decision on the dispute. If the party who is the defendant takes the view that the complaint should be rejected because it is clearly vexatious, he may apply to the Tribunal, before filing the reply, for permission to confine his arguments to that point. Otherwise he will incur the danger that the Tribunal declare the allegations of fact in the complaint to be established."

  Keywords:

  acceptance; condition; consequence; organisation's duties; reply confined to receivability; submissions; tribunal;
  

  
  
  

• Judgment 556

  
  50th Session, 1983
  International Labour Organization
  Extracts: EN, FR
  Full Judgment Text: EN, FR

  Consideration 2

  Extract:

  Article 19 of the Rules of court "empowers the President to make such orders only in the interval between sessions. Thus when in session the Tribunal itself will order measures of investigation in accordance with Article 11(1) of its Rules."

  Reference(s)

  ILOAT reference: ARTICLES 11 AND 19 OF THE RULES
  
  

  Keywords:

  competence of tribunal; iloat statute; inquiry; interlocutory order; investigation; order; submissions;
  

  
  
  

• Judgment 436

  
  45th Session, 1980
  International Labour Organization
  Extracts: EN, FR
  Full Judgment Text: EN, FR

  Consideration 4

  Extract:

  Under Article VIII of its Statute the Tribunal is entitled to award the complainant compensation for the injury caused to him. "For this purpose the Tribunal may under Article 11 of its Rules order such measures of investigation as it considers desirable. But it will not order an investigation merely for the sake of ascertaining the facts; the investigation must be in aid of some relief, such as reinstatement or compensation, which it is within the jurisdiction of the Tribunal to grant."

  Reference(s)

  ILOAT reference: ARTICLE VIII OF THE STATUTE;
  ARTICLE 11 OF THE RULES
  
  

  Keywords:

  competence of tribunal; condition; further submissions; iloat statute; injury; inquiry; investigation; material damages; moral injury; submissions;
  

  
  
  

• Judgment 175

  
  26th Session, 1971
  Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
  Extracts: EN, FR
  Full Judgment Text: EN, FR

  Consideration 1

  Extract:

  The Internal Advisory Committee "made its recommendation only after a thorough examination of the case, as a result of which the Tribunal is in possession of all the facts it needs to reach a decision. It is therefore unnecessary to call for an expert medical opinion."

  Keywords:

  advisory body; advisory opinion; expert inquiry; medical examination; submissions;
  

  
  
  

• Judgment 160

  
  24th Session, 1970
  World Health Organization
  Extracts: EN, FR
  Full Judgment Text: EN, FR

  Consideration 1

  Extract:

  The complainant had been on leave and then fell sick. He should have informed the registrar or have taken steps to ensure that the communication containing the memorandum in reply to his complaint was forwarded to him. "Consequently it was his own fault that he did not receive the communication [...] and did not reply within the time limit. There is therefore no reason to grant him a further time limit for his reply. Moreover, this could have been done only if it had been requested before the expiry of the original time limit. [...] The complainant's application was tardy." Since the dossier contains several memoranda by the complainant, the Tribunal can take its decision in full knowledge of the facts.

  Keywords:

  closure of written proceedings; complainant; delay; health reasons; negligence; new time limit; rejoinder; submissions;
  

  
  
  

• Judgment 131

  
  21st Session, 1969
  World Health Organization
  Extracts: EN, FR
  Full Judgment Text: EN, FR

  Consideration 1

  Extract:

  "The inquiry requested by the complainant in regard to the persons who cast doubt on his state of mental health would be justified only if it would help to establish facts relevant to the disposal of the complaint."

  Keywords:

  complainant; condition; illness; inquiry; investigation; refusal; request by a party; submissions; tribunal;
  

  
  
  

• Judgment 57

  
  10th Session, 1962
  World Health Organization
  Extracts: EN, FR
  Full Judgment Text: EN, FR

  Considerations

  Extract:

  "Although under Article 19 of its Rules of court the Tribunal may prescribe provisional measures during the preliminary examination of a complaint before it, no such measures can be contemplated unless they are directed to ensuring a fully satisfactory preliminary examination of the case, and unless they are conducive to that end, and such as to enable the Tribunal to issue a judgment based on a full knowledge of the facts or serving an effective purpose."

  Reference(s)

  ILOAT reference: ARTICLE 19 OF THE RULES
  
  

  Keywords:

  complaint; iloat statute; provisional measures; purpose; submissions;
  

< previous | 1, 2, 3