Case law (179, 687, 856,-666)
You searched for:
Keywords: Case law
Total judgments found: 279
< previous | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 | next >
Judgment 1432
79th Session, 1995
World Health Organization
Extracts: EN,
FR
Full Judgment Text: EN,
FR
Consideration 5
Extract:
Some days before the expiry of her contract the complainant's doctor prescribed a medical certificate for one month's sick leave. The complainant invokes Judgment 932 [...] which states that "a staff member cannot be separated while on sick leave" and argues that her appointment was prolonged for the duration of the sick leave. The Tribunal holds that "the effect was not to postpone the scheduled date of expiry of her contract. The fact is that she was not treated as having been on sick leave [during the period preceding the expiry of her contract]. So Judgment 938 [...] does not support her case."
Reference(s)
ILOAT Judgment(s): 938
Keywords:
case law; contract; non-renewal of contract; separation from service; sick leave;
Consideration 8
Extract:
"The Tribunal is satisfied that even though there was no formal written agreement between the organization and the complainant all the conditions that the case-law requires were met for the existence of a legally binding contract." The Tribunal recites the circumstances which allowed it to arrive at this conclusion.
Keywords:
case law; condition; contract; definition;
Judgment 1429
79th Session, 1995
International Labour Organization
Extracts: EN,
FR
Full Judgment Text: EN,
FR
Consideration 6
Extract:
See Judgment 1244.
Reference(s)
ILOAT reference: ARTICLE VII(1) OF THE STATUTE
ILOAT Judgment(s): 1244
Keywords:
case law; complaint; iloat statute; internal appeal; internal remedies exhausted; interpretation; procedure before the tribunal; receivability of the complaint;
Judgment 1422
79th Session, 1995
International Telecommunication Union
Extracts: EN,
FR
Full Judgment Text: EN,
FR
Consideration 6
Extract:
The Tribunal has ruled in Judgment 988 "that Regulation 4.9 allows the Secretary-General to promote someone even against the Appointment and Promotion Board's advice and is intended as a safeguard to ensure compliance with the rules on appointment and promotion. The intent is not to enable the Secretary-General to prefer a weaker candidate on compassionate or indeed any other grounds."
Reference(s)
Organization rules reference: ITU STAFF REGULATION 4.9
ILOAT Judgment(s): 988
Keywords:
advisory body; advisory opinion; appointment; case law; discretion; due process; enforcement; executive head; interpretation; promotion; promotion board; safeguard; selection board; staff regulations and rules;
Judgment 1421
79th Session, 1995
International Telecommunication Union
Extracts: EN,
FR
Full Judgment Text: EN,
FR
Consideration 3
Extract:
See Judgment 442, considerations 2 and 3
Reference(s)
ILOAT Judgment(s): 442
Keywords:
admissible grounds for review; application for review; case law; inadmissible grounds for review; judgment of the tribunal; receivability of the complaint; res judicata;
Judgment 1418
78th Session, 1995
Universal Postal Union
Extracts: EN,
FR
Full Judgment Text: EN,
FR
Consideration 6
Extract:
"According to the case law a decision not to renew a staff member's appointment is discretionary and will be set aside only if taken without authority or in breach of a rule of form or of procedure, or if based on a mistake of fact or of law, or if some essential fact was overlooked, or if clearly mistaken conclusions were drawn from the facts, or if there was abuse of authority. Those criteria hold good for any discretionary decision, but in reviewing a decision not to confirm the appointment of a probationer the Tribunal will be particularly cautious; otherwise probation would fail to serve as a period of trial."
Keywords:
case law; contract; discretion; judicial review; limits; non-renewal of contract; probationary period; purpose;
Judgment 1415
78th Session, 1995
European Organization for Nuclear Research
Extracts: EN,
FR
Full Judgment Text: EN,
FR
Consideration 7
Extract:
"As stated in Judgment 1354 and others delivered this day on similar cases, the tribunal has limited power of review over the Director-General's appraisal of performance for the purpose of choosing career paths."
Reference(s)
ILOAT Judgment(s): 1354, 1412, 1413, 1414, 1416
Keywords:
case law; discretion; executive head; grade; judicial review; qualifications;
Judgment 1405
78th Session, 1995
World Health Organization
Extracts: EN,
FR
Full Judgment Text: EN,
FR
Consideration 4
Extract:
"Precedent acknowledges an organisation's wide discretion in renewing a fixed-term appointment and its right to refuse renewal for reasons that include misconduct and unsatisfactory performance".
Keywords:
case law; contract; discretion; fixed-term; misconduct; non-renewal of contract; unsatisfactory service;
Judgment 1403
78th Session, 1995
European Organisation for the Safety of Air Navigation
Extracts: EN,
FR
Full Judgment Text: EN,
FR
Consideration 12
Extract:
Although the rules do not provide for the grant of a so-called typist's allowance for clerical officers, Eurocontrol has on an individual basis and upon application granted it to clerical officers who met certain objective conditions. "So the question at issue is whether Eurocontrol is bound in law by such long-standing practice. As was held in Judgment 421 [...] and again in Judgment 1053 [...] an organisation may be so bound where the practice is one that the staff have come to rely on."
Reference(s)
ILOAT Judgment(s): 421, 1053
Keywords:
allowance; binding character; case law; criteria; organisation's duties; practice; staff regulations and rules;
Judgment 1393
78th Session, 1995
European Patent Organisation
Extracts: EN,
FR
Full Judgment Text: EN,
FR
Consideration 7
Extract:
Vide Judgment 1279, consideration 9.
Reference(s)
ILOAT Judgment(s): 1279
Keywords:
case law; general decision; individual decision; internal appeal; receivability of the complaint; start of time limit; time bar; time limit;
Consideration 8
Extract:
"Consistent rulings by the Tribunal make it plain that the act which is challengeable and so sets off the time limit will ordinarily be some individual decision notified to the staff member. Only that decision affords him unquestionable and final notice that the time limit is set off and that he will have to act if he wants to assert his rights."
Reference(s)
ILOAT Judgment(s): 323, 398, 624, 625, 626, 902, 963, 1081, 1101, 1134, 1148
Keywords:
case law; cause of action; date of notification; individual decision; internal appeal; receivability of the complaint; start of time limit; time bar; time limit;
Judgment 1391
78th Session, 1995
European Patent Organisation
Extracts: EN,
FR
Full Judgment Text: EN,
FR
Consideration 12
Extract:
The complainant was subject to disciplinary action for statements, some of them before the Tribunal, which allegedly impaired the organisation's and the Tribunal's reputations. "Disciplinary action will be justified only if the staff member's conduct amounts to abuse of process or to a perversion of the right ofappeal. Such, for example, will be the case if his allegations 'are clearly wholly unfounded' (see Judgment 99 [...]); or if he appeals 'to the Tribunal for the purpose of lending force to the wild and unnecessarily wounding allegations [...] repeatedly made against the organisation' and has thereby 'entirely perverted from its proper purpose the right of appeal' to the Tribunal and has 'affronted the dignity of his organisation and of the Tribunal (see Judgment 96 [...]); or if his actions 'could neither have been directed to defending [his] freedom and rights, however widely interpreted, nor [...] make the slightest contribution to the disposal of the proceedings' (see Judgment 111 [...])."
Reference(s)
ILOAT Judgment(s): 96, 99, 111
Keywords:
case law; conduct; criteria; disciplinary measure; organisation's reputation; right of appeal; vexatious complaint;
Judgment 1390
78th Session, 1995
European Organisation for the Safety of Air Navigation
Extracts: EN,
FR
Full Judgment Text: EN,
FR
Consideration 15
Extract:
"Even supposing that the complainant applied only for transfer, the Tribunal's ruling in Judgment 1359 means - see under 5, 6 and 7 - that if an official applies for a transfer to a post to be filled by some other procedure he still has a legitimate interest, and any breach of that interest is liable to review and sanction."
Reference(s)
ILOAT Judgment(s): 1359
Keywords:
case law; cause of action; competition cancelled; internal candidate; judicial review; official; transfer;
Consideration 27
Extract:
The organisation argues that the International Court of Justice in an opinion it delivered on 23 October 1956 "recognised that the internal practices of international organisations may have force of law (Digest 1956, p. 18). But those practices must be lawful and must not offend, as they do in the present case, against the internal law of an organisation or the principles of due administrative process."
Keywords:
advisory opinion of icj; case law; competition cancelled; due process; icj; practice; staff regulations and rules; written rule;
Judgment 1388
78th Session, 1995
Intergovernmental Organisation for International Carriage by Rail
Extracts: EN,
FR
Full Judgment Text: EN,
FR
Consideration 13
Extract:
"According to consistent precedent promotion is at the discretion of the organisation, which must be free to grant or withhold it in accordance with objective working requirements. It follows that any grant of promotion at the time of retirement is inherently contrary to the organisation's interests because by then there can no longer be any question of taking on the higher level of responsibility that promotion entails."
Keywords:
case law; date; discretion; effective date; organisation's interest; promotion; retirement; right; separation from service;
Judgment 1386
78th Session, 1995
European Patent Organisation
Extracts: EN,
FR
Full Judgment Text: EN,
FR
Consideration 17
Extract:
Consistent precedent has it "that the administrative authority has the widest measure of discretion in confirming the appointment of a probationer (see Judgments 503, [...] under 2; 687, [...] under 2; 1052, [...] under 4; and 1161, [...] under 4). The purpose of such discretion is to ensure that the organisation may choose staff in full freedom and independence and in so doing it will assess the imponderable aspects of the probationer's personality, which must pose no threat to the harmony of staff relations. Here the Tribunal will not intervene in the administration's choice except in the event of abuse of authority or a clear mistake of law or of fact."
Reference(s)
ILOAT Judgment(s): 503, 687, 1052, 1161
Keywords:
case law; contract; criteria; discretion; judicial review; official; organisation's interest; permanent appointment; probationary period; working relations;
Judgment 1385
78th Session, 1995
International Labour Organization
Extracts: EN,
FR
Full Judgment Text: EN,
FR
Consideration 12
Extract:
"As the Tribunal held in Judgment 701, under 5: 'the function of a court of law is to interpret and apply a contract in accordance with the intention of the parties.'"
Reference(s)
ILOAT Judgment(s): 701
Keywords:
case law; contract; enforcement; intention of parties; interpretation;
Judgment 1384
78th Session, 1995
World Health Organization
Extracts: EN,
FR
Full Judgment Text: EN,
FR
Consideration 15
Extract:
Vide Judgment 999, consideration 4
Reference(s)
ILOAT Judgment(s): 999
Keywords:
case law; evidence; misconduct; right to reply;
Consideration 9
Extract:
"As the Tribunal has consistently affirmed - more recently, for example, in Judgment 1317 [...], under 24 and 28 - an organisation is required to give a reason for [the] non-renewal [of a fixed-term appointment]".
Reference(s)
ILOAT Judgment(s): 1317
Keywords:
case law; contract; decision; duty to substantiate decision; fixed-term; non-renewal of contract;
Judgment 1376
77th Session, 1994
World Health Organization
Extracts: EN,
FR
Full Judgment Text: EN,
FR
Consideration 13
Extract:
"According to the case law - see for example Judgment 607 [...] under 8 - though the rules on internal appeals must be respected because proper administration so requires, 'they are not supposed to be a trap or a means of catching out a staff member who acts in good faith'."
Reference(s)
ILOAT Judgment(s): 607
Keywords:
case law; good faith; internal appeal; internal remedies exhausted; organisation's duties; organisation's interest; right of appeal; staff member's interest; time limit;
Judgment 1374
77th Session, 1994
Pan American Health Organization
Extracts: EN,
FR
Full Judgment Text: EN,
FR
Consideration 6
Extract:
According to the case law (see Judgments 469 and 1045) the reduction-in-force procedure "must be followed before, not after, notice of termination is given. In line with the rules and the case law, therefore, the notices of termination served on the complainants [...] were premature and so unlawful and without effect. For that reason [...] their contracts must be deemed to have been extended by implication."
Reference(s)
ILOAT Judgment(s): 469, 1045
Keywords:
case law; contract; due process; flaw; non-renewal of contract; notice; procedure before the tribunal; reinstatement; staff reduction; staff regulations and rules;
Judgment 1373
77th Session, 1994
International Atomic Energy Agency
Extracts: EN,
FR
Full Judgment Text: EN,
FR
Consideration 21
Extract:
"In this judgment, which is an interlocutory order, the Tribunal will follow the precedent it set in Judgment 875 [...]. It orders two expert inquiries. It will appoint both a scientific expert and a medical expert, and their terms of reference will be as set out in the operative points of the decision below."
Reference(s)
ILOAT Judgment(s): 875
Keywords:
case law; expert inquiry; further submissions; interlocutory order;
Consideration 16
Extract:
The Medical Board based its findings on the lack of "conclusive" evidence. "But that was not the standard of proof it was required to apply." Referring to Judgments 528 and 641, the Tribunal holds that what is required is no more "than a balance of probability in favour of what the complainant is alleging.
Reference(s)
ILOAT Judgment(s): 528, 641
Keywords:
burden of proof; case law; evidence; medical board; standard of proof;
Judgment 1372
77th Session, 1994
World Health Organization
Extracts: EN,
FR
Full Judgment Text: EN,
FR
Consideration 11
Extract:
"As the Tribunal held in Judgments 1177 [...], under 5, and 1323 [...], under 9, an item that forms part of the proceedings that led to the impugned decision may not be withheld from scrutiny by the Tribunal. That holds good for any appellate body. So the administration ought to have disclosed to the Regional Board the documents it required to enable it to take up the complainant's appeal properly."
Reference(s)
ILOAT Judgment(s): 1177, 1323
Keywords:
case law; confidential evidence; disclosure of evidence; flaw; internal appeal; internal appeals body; judicial review; moral injury; procedure before the tribunal;
Judgment 1370
77th Session, 1994
International Telecommunication Union
Extracts: EN,
FR
Full Judgment Text: EN,
FR
Consideration 14
Extract:
"Judgment 1317 [...] brought out the need for a properly functioning internal appeal procedure, of which the Appeal Board is an essential part. In this case the Board took far too long to report and failed to perform its function properly. Although in the circumstances the shortcomings of the appeal procedure may not be deemed to constitute bad faith, the ITU was negligent and caused the complainant injury. On that account it must afford him redress."
Reference(s)
ILOAT Judgment(s): 1317
Keywords:
case law; compensation; delay; flaw; good faith; injury; internal appeal; internal appeals body; moral injury; negligence; organisation's duties; procedure before the tribunal; report; staff member's interest;
< previous | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 | next >
|
