ILO is a specialized agency of the United Nations
ILO-en-strap
Site Map | Contact français
> Home > Triblex: case-law database > By thesaurus keyword

Respect for dignity (205, 206,-666)

You searched for:
Keywords: Respect for dignity
Total judgments found: 133

< previous | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7



  • Judgment 917


    65th Session, 1988
    Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
    Extracts: EN, FR
    Full Judgment Text: EN, FR

    Consideration 6

    Extract:

    The "principles that govern the international civil service [...] forbid discrimination and require that all members of the staff be treated considerately and with respect for their dignity."

    Keywords:

    equal treatment; general principle; international civil service principles; organisation's duties; respect for dignity;



  • Judgment 809


    61st Session, 1987
    United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization
    Extracts: EN, FR
    Full Judgment Text: EN, FR

    Consideration 20

    Extract:

    "[The] posts and the grade they carried were such that the decision was tantamount to a sanction. An organisation is bound to show due regard to the dignity and good name of its staff".

    Keywords:

    assignment; downgrading; grade; hidden disciplinary measure; moral injury; organisation's duties; post; professional injury; respect for dignity; transfer;



  • Judgment 781


    60th Session, 1986
    United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization
    Extracts: EN, FR
    Full Judgment Text: EN, FR

    Summary

    Extract:

    The Director-General informed the complainant on 25 May 1982 that his appointment as Assistant Director-General would end on 31 May 1983, when he would be transferred. He was on leave from 1 July 1982 to 31 May 1983. On 1 June 1983 he reported for duty at his former office. Shortly thereafter the Inspector-General came to tell him that the Director-General had ordered him to make an inventory of the papers that were in the office. UNESCO submits that the complainant's return to his former office was a "wilful act of defiance and insubordination". The complainant maintains that the organization was in breach of its duty to treat him with respect. The Tribunal finds that the main purpose of the Inspector-General's action was to impose on the complainant a moral sanction unwarranted by anything in the rules or by any factual consideration. Such an attack on his good name within the organization caused moral injury which, because of his senior rank, is the more serious.

    Keywords:

    moral injury; respect for dignity;



  • Judgment 611


    53rd Session, 1984
    United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization
    Extracts: EN, FR
    Full Judgment Text: EN, FR

    Consideration 9

    Extract:

    "The complainant is a man of parts and gave Unesco years of distinguished service. Unesco would have done well to treat him with greater consideration. Whatever attitude he may have taken on the termination of his appointment Unesco had no imperative reason to reject the offer of help he made them [...] Yet, though they were not as understanding as they might have been, they did not exceed their rights under the Staff Regulations and Staff Rules."

    Keywords:

    organisation's duties; respect for dignity;



  • Judgment 509


    48th Session, 1982
    International Labour Organization
    Extracts: EN, FR
    Full Judgment Text: EN, FR

    Consideration 16

    Extract:

    "[The complainant] also seeks protection against defamation. There is, however, nothing in the written evidence to suggest that aspersions have been cast on her honour at any point in the proceedings."

    Keywords:

    lack of evidence; moral injury; respect for dignity;



  • Judgment 476


    47th Session, 1982
    Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
    Extracts: EN, FR
    Full Judgment Text: EN, FR

    Consideration 1

    Extract:

    "Even where it has no reason to set a decision aside, the Tribunal may award moral damages to a complainant who, on account of injury to his dignity and reputation, has suffered serious prejudice such as to hamper his career."

    Keywords:

    condition; moral injury; professional injury; respect for dignity;



  • Judgment 427


    45th Session, 1980
    Pan American Health Organization
    Extracts: EN, FR
    Full Judgment Text: EN, FR

    Consideration 19(D)

    Extract:

    "It is not a simple case of non-renewal. The complainant was the victim of a misconceived charge of misconduct of which the Director pronounced him to be guilty. The letter dropping the charge contained no withdrawal or apology and was composed as if the dropping was an act of lenience [...]. The illegal use of [the provision respecting special leave] made it appear as if the complainant had been summarily dismissed. [...] By these acts the complainant must have been caused deep distress. On the natural assumption that this course of action was pursued by a Director exercising wisdom and impartiality the interested public would inevitably conclude that the complainant had in some way disgraced himself".

    Keywords:

    contract; fixed-term; lack of evidence; moral injury; non-renewal of contract; professional injury; respect for dignity; serious misconduct;



  • Judgment 396


    43rd Session, 1980
    Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
    Extracts: EN, FR
    Full Judgment Text: EN, FR

    Consideration 5

    Extract:

    "Under any contract of appointment the organization, even in the absence of express provision, is bound to respect an official's dignity and reputation - in other words to beware of putting him needlessly in a difficult personal position. If the organization fails in that duty it may be ordered to pay compensation, even if there is no decision to be set aside [...] however, only for serious wrong likely to prove damaging to a staff member's career."

    Keywords:

    material damages; moral injury; no provision; organisation's duties; professional injury; respect for dignity;



  • Judgment 367


    41st Session, 1978
    World Health Organization
    Extracts: EN, FR
    Full Judgment Text: EN, FR

    Consideration 16

    Extract:

    "Just as it is implicit in every contract of service that the staff member shall be loyal, shall treat his superiors with due respect and shall guard the reputation of the organization, so it is implicit that the administration in its treatment of staff members shall have a care for their dignity and reputation and shall not cause them unnecessarily personal distress."

    Keywords:

    general principle; organisation's duties; organisation's reputation; professional injury; respect for dignity; staff member's duties; supervisor;

    Summary

    Extract:

    After 20 years of "laudable service", the complainant, a "valuable member of [the organization's] staff" was transferred. The organization, in its treatment of the complainant, failed in its obligation to show due regard for his dignity and reputation; the Director-General's apology did not remedy the situation.

    Keywords:

    moral injury; organisation's duties; respect for dignity; satisfactory service; transfer;



  • Judgment 361


    41st Session, 1978
    World Health Organization
    Extracts: EN, FR
    Full Judgment Text: EN, FR

    Consideration 9

    Extract:

    Vide Judgment 367, consideration 16.

    Reference(s)

    ILOAT Judgment(s): 367

    Keywords:

    organisation's duties; organisation's reputation; professional injury; respect for dignity; staff member's duties; supervisor;



  • Judgment 150


    23rd Session, 1970
    Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
    Extracts: EN, FR
    Full Judgment Text: EN, FR

    Consideration 2

    Extract:

    "In cases where the Director-General suspects an official of having committed acts of undiscipline in the performance of or in connection with his duties, he has to take action in the most adroit fashion to safeguard, if possible, the reputation of both the organization and of the official. For that reason, before initiating the disciplinary procedure, the Director-General is always free [...] to summon the official and ask him for explanations."

    Keywords:

    complainant; disciplinary procedure; executive head; inquiry; investigation; misconduct; organisation's duties; organisation's reputation; respect for dignity;



  • Judgment 126


    20th Session, 1968
    European Organization for Nuclear Research
    Extracts: EN, FR
    Full Judgment Text: EN, FR

    Consideration 4

    Extract:

    "[W]hile as a general rule employees in a given grade must be assigned to work normally done by members of that grade, it is within the discretion of the Director-General, provided that there is no change in the grade or reduction in salary, nor any lowering of the dignity of the persons concerned, to assign them to work done by lower-grade employees if the needs of the service so require".

    Keywords:

    assignment; discretion; downgrading; grade; limits; organisation's duties; organisation's interest; respect for dignity; salary; transfer;



  • Judgment 121


    20th Session, 1968
    Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
    Extracts: EN, FR
    Full Judgment Text: EN, FR

    Considerations

    Extract:

    "The organization has [...] committed a breach of contract by suspending the complainant otherwise than in accordance with the Staff Regulations. Since his emoluments have been fully paid, he has suffered no material damage, but he has suffered moral damage. He is entitled to compensation for the distress caused by the abrupt way in which he was treated, tantamount in its form to summary dismissal, and for the injury done to his reputation and to his prospects of obtaining other employment."

    Keywords:

    breach; flaw; injury; moral injury; professional injury; provision; respect for dignity; staff regulations and rules; summary dismissal; suspension;

< previous | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7


 
Last updated: 05.07.2024 ^ top