Enforcement (236,-666)
You searched for:
Keywords: Enforcement
Total judgments found: 208
< previous | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 | next >
Judgment 911
64th Session, 1988
United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization
Extracts: EN,
FR
Full Judgment Text: EN,
FR
Consideration 17
Extract:
"Although, as UNESCO says and indeed the Tribunal has held, facilities are not a matter for negotiation or agreement and although no obligation attaches to the actual outcome of consultations, one of an executive head's duties is to consult the staff association in keeping with [...] general principles [...] reflected in Chapter VIII [of the Staff Regulations]."
Reference(s)
Organization rules reference: CHAPTER VIII OF THE UNESCO STAFF REGULATIONS
Keywords:
consultation; enforcement; facilities; general principle; organisation's duties; staff regulations and rules; staff union;
Consideration 3
Extract:
"The organization [...] accepts as a term of every contract of appointment its duty to respect freedom of association, and anyone who has such a contract may challenge any decision that impairs that freedom. What the complainant is saying - indeed it is the sole issue - is that the organization acted in breach of freedom of association. His complaint is therefore receivable insofar as he is suing in his own name."
Keywords:
competence of tribunal; enforcement; freedom of association; locus standi; official; receivability of the complaint; staff regulations and rules; staff representative;
Judgment 905
64th Session, 1988
Intergovernmental Council of Copper Exporting Countries
Extracts: EN,
FR
Full Judgment Text: EN,
FR
Summary
Extract:
A cost-of-living adjustment is provided for in the Staff Regulations. No final decision was taken on the matter. The complainant is entitled to the adjustment.
Reference(s)
Organization rules reference: ARTICLES 3.2.1 AND 5.3 OF THE CIPEC STAFF REGULATIONS
Keywords:
adjustment; cost-of-living increase; enforcement; staff regulations and rules;
Judgment 902
64th Session, 1988
European Organisation for the Safety of Air Navigation
Extracts: EN,
FR
Full Judgment Text: EN,
FR
Consideration 27
Extract:
"If a staff member [...] lodges an appeal under the Staff Regulations he may thereby also challenge the lawfulness of any decision of the Permanent Commission's that affords the legal basis for the individual decision by the appointing authority if he alleges breach of the rules and principles of the international civil service that are binding on the organisation. As the Tribunal says in Judgment 899 [...], under 19, an organisation may not cite its own decision-making procedures to avoid compliance with the rules in dealings with staff."
Reference(s)
ILOAT Judgment(s): 899
Keywords:
competence of tribunal; enforcement; general decision; international civil service principles; legislative body; organisation's duties;
Judgment 886
64th Session, 1988
European Patent Organisation
Extracts: EN,
FR
Full Judgment Text: EN,
FR
Consideration 11
Extract:
In Judgment 855, "under 16, the Tribunal upheld its earlier ruling in Judgment 657 of 18 March 1985 [...]: there was nothing improper about applying the eight-year rule, which was indeed in keeping with the Administrative Council's guidelines. [The complainant] had no right to fare better on the strength of a method of reckoning that had been superseded by the time he took up duty, the less so since he had been told of the terms of appointment in force at the time and had consented to them."
Reference(s)
ILOAT Judgment(s): 657, 855
Keywords:
administrative instruction; amendment to the rules; appointment; date; enforcement; professional experience; provision; reckoning; seniority; terms of appointment;
Consideration 10
Extract:
"The complainant was recruited from the British Office before the guidelines in Circular 144 came in but in the
course of a period in which the guidelines had retroactive effect. For the reasons stated in Judgment 855 under 12
and 13, the Tribunal holds that he was governed by the rules in force before Circular 144 and at the time of his
recruitment."
Reference(s)
Organization rules reference: CIRCULAR 144
ILOAT Judgment(s): 855
Keywords:
administrative instruction; amendment to the rules; appointment; consequence; date; enforcement; provision; transitional measures;
Judgment 870
63rd Session, 1987
International Labour Organization
Extracts: EN,
FR
Full Judgment Text: EN,
FR
Consideration 4
Extract:
"Such service [technical assistance] may not count for the purpose of personal promotion unless there is an express rule to that effect. There is not. [...] Periods of service [on technical co-operation projects] do not count, not even when, like the complainant, [experts] are later appointed to the staff at headquarters."
Keywords:
administrative instruction; difference; enforcement; field; headquarters official; interpretation; personal promotion; project personnel;
Judgment 869
63rd Session, 1987
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Extracts: EN,
FR
Full Judgment Text: EN,
FR
Consideration 19(C)
Extract:
"The organization [has] failed to prove that the complainant knew or ought to have known of the change in the operation of the provision." It concerned paragraph 315.323 of the FAO Manual on withholding salary increments.
Keywords:
amendment to the rules; burden of proof; duty to inform; enforcement; lack of evidence; provision; staff regulations and rules;
Judgment 862
63rd Session, 1987
International Labour Organization
Extracts: EN,
FR
Full Judgment Text: EN,
FR
Consideration 7
Extract:
"Suspension is temporary repeal: while in force it makes the text void. What distinguishes it from repeal is that it is not final, its purpose being to provide against some temporary contingency, and it need only be lifted for the text to come into force again. But repeal is final and once a text has been repealed the law-maker has to adopt a new one to bring the provisions back into effect."
Keywords:
binding character; difference; effect; enforcement; period; provision; provisional measures; staff regulations and rules; suspensive action; written rule;
Consideration 10
Extract:
Article 3.1.1.2 of the ILO Staff Regulations provides for periodic adjustments to pensionable remuneration. The application of this regulation was suspended effective 1 April 1985. The complainants argue that the absence of an adjustment on 1 April 1986 breaches their acquired rights. "The complainants say they cannot put a figure on the loss sustained but they submit a table showing losses that range from 13 to 39 per cent according to grade. The table does not distinguish between loss due to the measures of which the Tribunal was informed in the earlier proceedings - and which it declared lawful - and loss alleged to be due to the failure to revise the scale on 1 April 1986. So in any event the Tribunal cannot but endorse its ruling in Judgment 832 under 16." The complaints are dismissed.
Reference(s)
Organization rules reference: ARTICLE 3.1.1.2 OF THE ILO STAFF REGULATIONS
ILOAT Judgment(s): 832
Keywords:
acquired right; adjustment; amount; breach; date; difference; enforcement; grade; injury; pension; pension entitlements; pensionable remuneration; provision; reckoning; res judicata; staff regulations and rules; subsidiary; suspensive action;
Judgment 845
63rd Session, 1987
European Patent Organisation
Extracts: EN,
FR
Full Judgment Text: EN,
FR
Summary
Extract:
The complainant claims 'rapid promotion' by virtue of the exception provided for in paragraph 64 of document CA/PV 10 concerning EPO staff members who were recruited before 1 January 1981. Inasmuch as the complainant was appointed after that date, he is not entitled to the promotion.
Keywords:
administrative instruction; appointment; date; effective date; enforcement; personal promotion; promotion;
Judgment 832
62nd Session, 1987
International Labour Organization
Extracts: EN,
FR
Full Judgment Text: EN,
FR
Consideration 7
Extract:
As a result of the adoption of a new scale of pensionable remuneration, Article 3.1.1 of the ILO Staff Regulations was amended. "The complainants' case does not rest on breach of any term of their contracts or of any provision of the Staff Regulations. What they are saying is that as applied to them Article 3.1.1 of the Regulations impairs their acquired rights. Their complaints will therefore be receivable if the application of 3.1.1 does cause them injury."
Reference(s)
Organization rules reference: ARTICLE 3.1.1 OF THE ILO STAFF REGULATIONS
Keywords:
amendment to the rules; cause of action; competence of tribunal; condition; enforcement; general decision; individual decision; injury; pension; pensionable remuneration; provision; receivability of the complaint; scale; staff regulations and rules;
Judgment 831
62nd Session, 1987
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Extracts: EN,
FR
Full Judgment Text: EN,
FR
Consideration 18
Extract:
"Whether or not the decision [of the International Civil Service Commission] is put into the Staff Regulations is immaterial: be that as it may it is binding on the Director-General only if lawful."
Keywords:
binding character; condition; enforcement; executive head; general decision; icsc decision; judicial review;
Judgment 830
62nd Session, 1987
World Health Organization
Extracts: EN,
FR
Full Judgment Text: EN,
FR
Consideration 18
Extract:
See Judgment 831, consideration 18.
Reference(s)
ILOAT Judgment(s): 831
Keywords:
binding character; condition; enforcement; executive head; general decision; icsc decision; judicial review;
Judgment 829
62nd Session, 1987
General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade
Extracts: EN,
FR
Full Judgment Text: EN,
FR
Consideration 18
Extract:
Vide Judgment 831, consideration 18.
Reference(s)
ILOAT Judgment(s): 831
Keywords:
binding character; condition; enforcement; executive head; general decision; icsc decision; judicial review;
Judgment 827
62nd Session, 1987
United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization
Extracts: EN,
FR
Full Judgment Text: EN,
FR
Consideration 18
Extract:
See Judgment 831, consideration 18.
Reference(s)
ILOAT Judgment(s): 831
Keywords:
binding character; condition; enforcement; executive head; general decision; icsc decision; judicial review;
Judgment 826
62nd Session, 1987
International Telecommunication Union
Extracts: EN,
FR
Full Judgment Text: EN,
FR
Consideration 18
Extract:
See Judgment 831, consideration 18.
Reference(s)
ILOAT Judgment(s): 831
Keywords:
binding character; condition; enforcement; executive head; general decision; icsc decision; judicial review;
Judgment 825
62nd Session, 1987
International Labour Organization
Extracts: EN,
FR
Full Judgment Text: EN,
FR
Consideration 18
Extract:
See Judgment 831, consideration 18.
Reference(s)
ILOAT Judgment(s): 831
Keywords:
binding character; condition; enforcement; executive head; general decision; icsc decision; judicial review;
Judgment 822
62nd Session, 1987
European Molecular Biology Laboratory
Extracts: EN,
FR
Full Judgment Text: EN,
FR
Consideration 3
Extract:
"The grants [the complainant] is claiming under [his new] contract are those which were payable on the cancellation of an indefinite contract under the rules in force 'on this day'. The Tribunal takes that expression to denote [...] the date on which the letter was signed, not [...] the date when the complainant left on the expiry of his contract."
Keywords:
amendment to the rules; date; enforcement; interpretation; provision; staff regulations and rules; terminal entitlements;
Judgment 809
61st Session, 1987
United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization
Extracts: EN,
FR
Full Judgment Text: EN,
FR
Consideration 14
Extract:
"The organization submits that it followed a practice introduced by the master standard for job classification which the International Civil Service Commission has approved and which applies throughout the United Nations system. But the master standard does not apply directly to the staff of the international organisations: it consists of mere guidelines which the organisations are free to introduce into their own regulations."
Keywords:
administrative instruction; binding character; enforcement; general decision; icsc decision; post classification; practice; rule of another organisation; staff regulations and rules;
Judgment 751
59th Session, 1986
European Patent Organisation
Extracts: EN,
FR
Full Judgment Text: EN,
FR
Consideration 2
Extract:
"It is [...] immaterial that the Committee did not comment on the figures in the new salary scales. [...] In this instance what 'concerns the whole or part of the staff' is the rules for calculating the salaries of staff categories, not the actual amounts individual staff members will be paid".
Keywords:
advisory body; advisory opinion; amendment to the rules; consultation; enforcement; organisation's duties; provision; reckoning; salary; scale; staff regulations and rules;
Consideration 3
Extract:
"The plea that no reasons were given for the impugned decision is also unsound. There can be no obligation whatever on the EPO to state its reasons for introducing scales approved by the Council. Such a decision finds its justification quite simply in the administration's position of subordination to the Council."
Keywords:
administrative instruction; amendment to the rules; decision; duty to substantiate decision; enforcement; executive body; general decision; provision; salary; scale;
Judgment 744
58th Session, 1986
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Extracts: EN,
FR
Full Judgment Text: EN,
FR
Considerations 4-5
Extract:
Under the circumstances, the Tribunal shall be competent to hear the complaint, the complainant being entitled to assert a right granted to him under the headquarters agreement and which accrues to him by virtue of the terms of appointment.
Keywords:
competence of tribunal; contract; enforcement; headquarters agreement; international instrument;
Judgment 742
58th Session, 1986
International Labour Organization
Extracts: EN,
FR
Full Judgment Text: EN,
FR
Consideration 7
Extract:
"Where a provision of the Staff Regulations is amended the Tribunal may order the organisation to apply the old text rather than the new one. Likewise, where provisions of the Staff Regulations are replaced by clauses of an international agreement, the Tribunal may order the organisation to apply the former instead of the latter. The Tribunal is therefore competent."
Keywords:
amendment to the rules; competence of tribunal; enforcement; international instrument; pension; provision; staff regulations and rules;
< previous | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 | next >
|
