Different appraisals (286,-666)

You searched for:
Keywords: Different appraisals
Total judgments found: 22

< previous | 1, 2

• Judgment 191

  
  28th Session, 1972
  United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization
  Extracts: EN, FR
  Full Judgment Text: EN, FR

  Considerations

  Extract:

  "The Director-General fell into the error of supposing that because the limited part of the complainant's work which he himself saw was bad in his opinion therefore the complainant's work as a whole was to be condemned. In treating as of no account the unanimous opinion of those who were familiar with the whole of [the complainant's] performance, the Director-General failed to take into consideration essential facts of the case. His decision must therefore be quashed."

  Keywords:

  contract; different appraisals; disregard of essential fact; fixed-term; non-renewal of contract; satisfactory service; unsatisfactory service; work appraisal;
  

  Considerations

  Extract:

  "While the Director-General [...] was entitled to differ [with] the opinion expressed by the high-ranking officials [...] he should, before reaching the final decision which he alone was competent to make, have taken into account not only the complainant's attitude on the particular occasions when he had 'personally seen him at work', but also the quality of the complainant's general performance of his duties as attested by his immediate supervisors in highly favourable terms."

  Keywords:

  contract; different appraisals; disregard of essential fact; executive head; fixed-term; non-renewal of contract; supervisor; unsatisfactory service; work appraisal;
  

  
  
  

• Judgment 65

  
  11th Session, 1962
  World Health Organization
  Extracts: EN, FR
  Full Judgment Text: EN, FR

  Consideration 3

  Extract:

  "The decision not to renew the complainant's appointment [...] taken on the basis of a single unfavourable report after a long period of satisfactory service, would leave out of account essential material elements and would constitute an obviously wrong conclusion drawn from the record unless the appraisal report and the comments thereon disclosed sufficiently serious deficiencies in the work or conduct of the official concerned to justify by themselves the decision not to renew the official's appointment."

  Keywords:

  conduct; contract; different appraisals; disregard of essential fact; fixed-term; mistaken conclusion; non-renewal of contract; performance report; satisfactory service; unsatisfactory service;
  

< previous | 1, 2