Reinstatement (315,-666)
You searched for:
Keywords: Reinstatement
Total judgments found: 173
< previous | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 | next >
Judgment 1242
74th Session, 1993
World Intellectual Property Organization
Extracts: EN,
FR
Full Judgment Text: EN,
FR
Considerations 4-5
Extract:
The complainant submits that the organization did not do its utmost to reinstate him in execution of Judgment 1154. WIPO's letter "does not substantiate the contention that it had. it simply conveys the Director General's decision 'not to extend [the complainant]'s appointment'. It says nothing of any attempts to find him a suitable position and thereby discharge its primary obligation under Judgment 1154. [...] The Director General had the duty to justify his decision by explaining why it was impossible to reinstate the complainant [...] only in its reply to this complaint does the organization maintain that 'there was no possibility of reinstating the complainant since there was no suitable post to which he could be appointed given his qualifications'."
Reference(s)
ILOAT Judgment(s): 1154
Keywords:
application for execution; duty to substantiate decision; good faith; judgment of the tribunal; organisation; organisation's duties; refusal; reinstatement; reply; res judicata; submissions; tribunal;
Judgment 1238
74th Session, 1993
World Health Organization
Extracts: EN,
FR
Full Judgment Text: EN,
FR
Consideration 5
Extract:
The Tribunal orders the complainant's reinstatement. The organization "must do its utmost to reinstate him in the post which he held [...] or in any comparable one acceptable to him. Only if that proved impossible should it pay him additional damages equivalent to the salary, allowances and other entitlements which he would have received over a period of two years had he been reinstated in its employ as from the date of this judgment."
Keywords:
allowance; compensation; date; flaw; judgment of the tribunal; post; post held by the complainant; reinstatement; salary; termination of employment;
Consideration 4
Extract:
The Tribunal ordered the complainant's reinstatement in Judgment 999. But the Director-General decided that reinstatement was not in the interest of the organization and awarded him compensation. "To condemn someone to unemployment on account of a single negligent act unaccompanied by improper intention, and in circumstances that do not justify loss of confidence by the employer, is to demand a humanly impossible standard of performance by the employee and makes the right to reinstatement illusory."
Reference(s)
ILOAT Judgment(s): 999
Keywords:
complainant; discretion; good faith; limits; negligence; organisation; organisation's interest; proportionality; refusal; reinstatement; right; termination of employment;
Consideration 5
Extract:
"In the circumstances the refusal of reinstatement is not justified, and the fact that dismissal occurred over five years ago does not stand in the way of reinstatement, especially since the complainant was not responsible for any of the delay. He is accordingly entitled to reinstatement."
Keywords:
date; discretion; limits; mistake of fact; organisation's interest; refusal; reinstatement; right; termination of employment;
Consideration 4
Extract:
"An employee who is wrongfully dismissed is ordinarily entitled to reinstatement. But the Tribunal may refuse to order it if it is not possible or advisable. It would not, for instance, order reinstatement if the circumstances of the dismissal were such that it would no longer be reasonably possible for the employee to perform his duties effectively or harmoniously or for the employer to continue to feel confidence or trust in him."
Keywords:
flaw; organisation's interest; reinstatement; termination of employment; tribunal; working relations;
Consideration 4
Extract:
"Even if the Director-General has discretion to refuse reinstatement 'in the interest of the organization' he must exercise it fairly and reasonably after considering all the material facts. Here the facts were that the complainant had throughout had irreproachable appraisal reports. [...] Despite surveillance, without his knowledge, for six months prior to [the incident that led to his dismissal] no wrongdoing, negligence or irregularity on his part was discovered. [...] The Director-General has failed to take into consideration the above material facts and has erred in treating the complainant as guilty of a 'cover-up'. The refusal of reinstatement was thus not a proper exercise of whatever discretion he had in the matter."
Keywords:
complainant; discretion; disregard of essential fact; flaw; limits; mistake of fact; negligence; organisation; organisation's interest; performance report; refusal; reinstatement; right; termination of employment;
Judgment 1221
74th Session, 1993
United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization
Extracts: EN,
FR
Full Judgment Text: EN,
FR
Consideration 7
Extract:
"The complainant's appointment expired on 31 March 1992 and there was no reason why the organization should renew it. In the light of all the material circumstances, including her behaviour, the Tribunal disallows her claim to reinstatement."
Keywords:
complainant; conduct; contract; fixed-term; non-renewal of contract; refusal; reinstatement; request by a party; tribunal;
Judgment 1193
73rd Session, 1992
Pan American Health Organization
Extracts: EN,
FR
Full Judgment Text: EN,
FR
Consideration 13
Extract:
The complaint being allowed because of the procedural flaw, the complainant is reinstated as from the date of termination of his appointment and he must be given the benefit of proper compliance with the reduction-in-force procedure.
Keywords:
reinstatement;
Judgment 1110
71st Session, 1991
European Southern Observatory
Extracts: EN,
FR
Full Judgment Text: EN,
FR
Summary
Extract:
In Judgment 996 the Tribunal set aside the decision to dismiss the complainant and ordered his reinstatement "with full arrears of salary and allowances". In execution of that judgment the ESO reinstated him as a member of its health insurance scheme as from the date of dismissal and deducted the corresponding premiums from his pay. The complainant's objections to the deductions are mistaken. The intention of Judgment 996 was, as far as possible, to put the complainant in the same position as if he had not been dismissed. The Tribunal is satisfied that in respect of health insurance the organisation has complied with the letter and the spirit of the judgment.
Reference(s)
ILOAT Judgment(s): 996
Keywords:
application for interpretation; consequence; contributions; deduction; health insurance; insurance; interpretation; judgment of the tribunal; medical expenses; payment; reinstatement; salary;
Judgment 1074
70th Session, 1991
European Organisation for the Safety of Air Navigation
Extracts: EN,
FR
Full Judgment Text: EN,
FR
Summary
Extract:
Following a period on unpaid leave for personal reasons, the complainant could not be reinstated under Article 40(3)(d), which entitles him to reinstatement under certain conditions. He alleges breach of the terms of appointment by Eurocontrol. The Tribunal observes that "he is unable to point to any one vacant post corresponding to his grade, category and service in which the organisation have failed to reinstate him. Still less is he able to point to such a series of failures to reinstate him as might raise the presumption of a decision by the organisation never to reinstate him at all".
Reference(s)
Organization rules reference: ARTICLE 40 OF THE GENERAL CONDITIONS OF EMPLOYMENT GOVERNING SERVANTS AT THE EUROCONTROL MAASTRICHT CENTRE
Keywords:
compassionate leave; organisation's duties; reinstatement; right; special leave; unpaid leave;
Judgment 997
68th Session, 1990
European Southern Observatory
Extracts: EN,
FR
Full Judgment Text: EN,
FR
Consideration 8
Extract:
"By virtue of Judgment 996 the complainant is entitled to reinstatement with full arrears of salary and allowances. The benefits he would have been entitled to but for dismissal included home leave for himself and his family [...]. Should [his family] choose to travel at another time the cost of their home leave will be due to him by virtue of Judgment 996."
Reference(s)
ILOAT Judgment(s): 996
Keywords:
allowance; consequence; decision quashed; home leave; refund; reinstatement; right; salary; termination of employment;
Judgment 996
68th Session, 1990
European Southern Observatory
Extracts: EN,
FR
Full Judgment Text: EN,
FR
Consideration 6
Extract:
"The requirement in [Article R II 1.24 of] the [ESO] Staff Regulations that the staff member consent to transfer is in marked contrast to other international organisations, in which transfer is common and the executive head has discretion to transfer staff from one duty station to another whether they consent or not. The complainant is correct in his submission that there is no provision in the ESO's rules for dismissal on the grounds of refusal of transfer."
Reference(s)
Organization rules reference: ARTICLE R II 1.24 OF THE ESO STAFF REGULATIONS
Keywords:
duty station; enforcement; organisation's duties; refusal; reinstatement; staff regulations and rules; termination of employment; transfer;
Judgment 972
66th Session, 1989
World Meteorological Organization
Extracts: EN,
FR
Full Judgment Text: EN,
FR
Consideration 20
Extract:
The Tribunal is satisfied that in the circumstances the complainant's reinstatement would not be advisable. It notes from the Joint Appeals Board's report that the complainant obtained a temporary appointment with the United States University Space Research Association in Geneva from the end of January 1988: doubtless his special skills will not go unnoticed by those who need the services of an expert in data management. The Tribunal will therefore award compensation in place of reinstatement, damages for moral injury, and costs.
Keywords:
reinstatement;
Judgment 907
64th Session, 1988
General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade
Extracts: EN,
FR
Full Judgment Text: EN,
FR
Consideration 7
Extract:
"Since he has twice had his dismissal set aside [the GATT] should reinstate him in a post equivalent to the one he held. If it does it shall pay him for the period from the date of his departure up to the date of his reinstatement, the amount to be reduced by the sums it has already paid him and any earnings he may have been paid during the period. His pension rights shall be fully restored."
Keywords:
amount; consequence; contract; damages; permanent appointment; reinstatement; termination of employment;
Judgment 888
64th Session, 1988
Pan American Health Organization
Extracts: EN,
FR
Full Judgment Text: EN,
FR
Considerations
Extract:
The complainant was accused of submitting false certificates for sick leave and was dismissed for serious misconduct. He claims to have been unaware that the certificates were false at the time he presented them and that, while awaiting the outcome of the judicial inquiry underway, he should be presumed innocent. The complainant's dismissal was confirmed by the Chief of personnel. That decision was "defective in that it did not reply to the complainant's letter inviting the organization to wait for the outcome of the trial and did not require him to furnish his full defence. It was made without the complainant's having fully exercised his right to be heard." Because it is tainted with a procedural flaw, the decision is quashed and the Tribunal orders the complainant to be reinstated and awarded an amount equivalent to the pay which he lost between the date of dismissal and that of reinstatement.
Keywords:
amount; flaw; material damages; medical certificate; misrepresentation; moral injury; procedural flaw; reinstatement; right to reply; serious misconduct; summary dismissal; termination of employment;
Judgment 756
59th Session, 1986
Pan American Health Organization
Extracts: EN,
FR
Full Judgment Text: EN,
FR
Consideration 2
Extract:
"The abolition was in fact just an expedient hurriedly found to put an end to the complainant's employment. That that is so is plain from evidence that shows the secretarial duties she had been performing were assigned to two others immediately after she left. Contrary to the telex sent to her on 21 August 1984 and informing her of the decision of 15 August, which said that her post was no longer considered necessary, in fact it was. the Tribunal accordingly holds that a mistaken and wrongful procedure was followed to end her contract and that the measure was therefore unlawful." The Tribunal orders the organization to reinstate the complainant.
Keywords:
abolition of post; abuse of power; contract; fixed-term; misuse of authority; reinstatement; termination of employment;
Consideration 4
Extract:
"Failing [...] reinstatement the complainant is entitled to be paid for the period during which she has not worked compensation equivalent to the sums she would have been paid if reinstated, the purpose being to safeguard the right to reinstatement."
Keywords:
abolition of post; amount; material damages; reinstatement; subsidiary;
Judgment 748
59th Session, 1986
World Health Organization
Extracts: EN,
FR
Full Judgment Text: EN,
FR
Consideration 2
Extract:
"Whether reinstatement is inadvisable is an issue of law. A mistake of law does not constitute admissible grounds for review, and the Tribunal's decision on the point, even if it was wrong, is not subject to review."
Reference(s)
ILOAT Judgment(s): 665
Keywords:
application for review; mistake of law; reinstatement;
Judgment 703
57th Session, 1985
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Extracts: EN,
FR
Full Judgment Text: EN,
FR
Consideration 4
Extract:
"Though a seconded official holds a fixed-term appointment his position is out of the ordinary. He cannot expect his contract to last more than two years unless the organisations decide differently. But on leaving the receiving organisation he goes back to the releasing one [...] It is therefore only reasonable that either organisation should have the right to end the secondment if it so wishes on the expiry of the prescribed period without having to explain its decision."
Keywords:
consequence; contract; discretion; duty to substantiate decision; fixed-term; non-renewal of contract; organisation's duties; reinstatement; secondment;
Judgment 687
57th Session, 1985
European Patent Organisation
Extracts: EN,
FR
Full Judgment Text: EN,
FR
Summary
Extract:
Although the complainant's performance showed improvement by the end of an extended period of probation, the organisation dismissed him. The Tribunal holds that the extension of probation gave him reason to believe that if his work was found satisfactory he would get appointed. The President drew clearly mistaken conclusions from the evidence. His decision is set aside and the complainant is referred back to the organisation for determination of his rights on reinstatement in its employ as from the date of his dismissal.
Keywords:
extension of contract; legitimate expectation; mistaken conclusion; probationary period; reconstruction of career; reinstatement; satisfactory service; termination of employment;
Judgment 635
54th Session, 1984
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Extracts: EN,
FR
Full Judgment Text: EN,
FR
Consideration 11
Extract:
The organization accuses the complainant of gross breach of her duty of discretion. The Tribunal finds that the decision to dismiss her was based on facts which were not sufficiently established. "Dismissal is too drastic a measure for the staff member not to have the benefit of the doubt. The decision being quashed, the complainant is entitled to straightforward reinstatement since the Tribunal sees no reason to award her damages in lieu. Since she seeks damages only if not reinstated the Tribunal need not rule on this claim."
Keywords:
benefit of doubt; disciplinary measure; misconduct; proportionality; reinstatement; serious misconduct; termination of employment;
Judgment 543
50th Session, 1983
Pan American Health Organization
Extracts: EN,
FR
Full Judgment Text: EN,
FR
Consideration 9
Extract:
"There is an allegation of bad faith based on the fact that the organization did nothing to facilitate the complainant's return to it. The allegation fails. In view of the complainant's attitude the only way in which the organization could have facilitated her return would have been by conceding to her the right to veto the place of work assigned to her. to refuse to make such a concession is not bad faith."
Keywords:
assignment; execution of judgment; good faith; judgment of the tribunal; organisation; reinstatement;
Judgment 541
49th Session, 1982
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Extracts: EN,
FR
Full Judgment Text: EN,
FR
Considerations
Extract:
When rendering his opinion, the organization's doctor took insufficient account of essential facts. "The complainant is therefore entitled to relief. The relief can take the form of re-instatement, which is one of the remedies sought by the complainant, or the payment of compensation, which is an alternative remedy sought. In the circumstances of this case, the latter solution appears more desirable [...]."
Keywords:
health reasons; material damages; reinstatement; subsidiary; termination of employment; termination of employment for health reasons;
Judgment 494
48th Session, 1982
Pan American Health Organization
Extracts: EN,
FR
Full Judgment Text: EN,
FR
Considerations 9-10
Extract:
"There is no indication in the dossier that if the proper procedure had been observed before termination the complainant would have made use of it to change her attitude; and she has in fact declined reinstatement. She has not therefore shown any financial loss that she would not have incurred anyway. "It may well be that, as she alleges, 'because of the abrupt manner in which she was terminated, there has been speculation that she was engaged in some wrong doing.' She is entitled to a sum sufficient to mark the fact that her dismissal was illegal."
Keywords:
flaw; lack of injury; material injury; moral injury; offer; procedural flaw; refusal; reinstatement; termination of employment; transfer;
Judgment 452
46th Session, 1981
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Extracts: EN,
FR
Full Judgment Text: EN,
FR
Consideration 4
Extract:
The organization's Governing Council decided to consider all general service officials, recruited after a certain date, as local staff and the Tribunal accepts that reinstatement is not the same as recruitment. But the fact that the Director-General could, consistent with the Council's declaration, have continued to reinstate non-local staff does not mean that he is required to do so. He is free to act as he wishes and the Tribunal cannot interfere.
Keywords:
appointment; condition; difference; discretion; general service category; local status; non-local status; reinstatement;
< previous | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 | next >
|
