Consultation (528,-666)

You searched for:
Keywords: Consultation
Total judgments found: 63

< previous | 1, 2, 3, 4

• Judgment 106

  
  17th Session, 1967
  United International Bureaux for the Protection of Intellectual Property
  Extracts: EN, FR
  Full Judgment Text: EN, FR

  Consideration 5(B)

  Extract:

  "Having conformed to his two-fold [statutory] obligation [to hear the opinion of the ad hoc committee and to base himself on the standards observed in other international organisations] the Director is free to exercise his discretion in carrying out the responsibilities assigned to him. It follows that the Administrative Tribunal must confine itself to determining whether" [at issue is the classification of posts].

  Keywords:

  advisory body; consultation; discretion; judicial review; limits; post classification; rule of another organisation;
  

  
  
  

• Judgment 50

  
  8th Session, 1960
  United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization
  Extracts: EN, FR
  Full Judgment Text: EN, FR

  Consideration 2

  Extract:

  "Any advisory administrative body that receives a request in accordance with its rules must, in all cases, express an opinion on the request, whatever the validity of the request, whenever the persons concerned are entitled to submit a matter to it; this is the case even if the said request is deemed to be not receivable. Questions of receivability often raise problems that are difficult to solve, and complainants are entitled to have them examined in the same manner as questions of substance."

  Keywords:

  advisory body; consultation; internal appeals body; report;
  

  
  
  

• Judgment 32

  
  7th Session, 1958
  United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization
  Extracts: EN, FR
  Full Judgment Text: EN, FR

  Considerations

  Extract:

  The irregularities indicated "resulted in depriving complainant of the opportunity of effectively discussing the appreciations made by his superiors, a fact aggravated by reason of the irregularities by which the procedure of the [Advisory] Committee was tainted, resulting in complainant being unable to avail himself of a procedure under which he might have been able to emphasise the qualities he claimed with a view to possibly obtaining an indeterminate appointment [...]. In this manner, the complainant was deprived of the possibility of having the decision taken modified, a possibility available to him under the Staff Regulations and Rules."

  Keywords:

  advisory body; consultation; contract; due process; fixed-term; flaw; non-renewal of contract; permanent appointment; procedural flaw; refusal; right to reply; work appraisal;
  

< previous | 1, 2, 3, 4