|
|
 |
|
|
Executive body (555,-666)
You searched for:
Keywords: Executive body
Total judgments found: 48
< previous | 1, 2, 3
Judgment 323
39th Session, 1977
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Extracts: EN,
FR
Full Judgment Text: EN,
FR
Consideration 22
Extract:
"Council decisions in staff matters are to be read as an instruction to the Director-General. It is his duty to put them into a form which clearly conveys to the official in precisely what way his rights are affected. It is the Director-General's decision which the official is entitled to have [...]."
Keywords:
decision; duty to inform; enforcement; executive body; executive head;
Consideration 25
Extract:
According to the organization "the decision impugned was taken by one of the governing bodies of the FAO in the exercise of its constitutional powers and represented a legislative enactment. [T]he term 'governing body' is not a term used in the constitution of the FAO and there is no definition of what it means." The Council is the executive organ of the Conference, which is the organization's supreme body. The Constitution gives the Council such powers as the Conference may delegate to it. "There is no assertion in the organization's reply of the delegation of any power that would justify the Council in depriving any official of any part of the salary to which under the Regulations he or she is entitled."
Keywords:
competence; decision-maker; executive body; reduction of salary; salary;
Judgment 294
38th Session, 1977
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Extracts: EN,
FR
Full Judgment Text: EN,
FR
Consideration 6
Extract:
"it is unnecessary to determine whether the council's decision automatically amended the rule to which the old salary schedule was attached... it is not to be expected that the council would itself consider and provide in detail for all the implications of the change. the council's function in relation to the staff is to settle or approve fundamental conditions of service and basic rights, duties and obligations..."
Keywords:
amendment to the rules; competence; decision; executive body; salary; scale; staff regulations and rules; terms of appointment;
Judgment 293
38th Session, 1977
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Extracts: EN,
FR
Full Judgment Text: EN,
FR
Consideration 1
Extract:
"It is not disputed that [...] the council of the organization could by means of a resolution supplement or amend the Staff Regulations without prejudice to the acquired rights of staff members."
Keywords:
acquired right; amendment to the rules; competence; decision; executive body; staff regulations and rules;
Judgment 278
37th Session, 1976
International Patent Institute
Extracts: EN,
FR
Full Judgment Text: EN,
FR
Considerations
Extract:
The Administrative Council "defined its position as follows: 'The provisions of the Staff Regulations and other texts relating to the staff should so far as possible match those applicable to European Communities staff.' It appears clearly from this statement, the precise purport of which is indicated by use of the term 'so far as possible', that the Administrative Council did not decide to ensure full conformity between [its Staff Regulations] and those of the European Communities, that it entered into no legal commitment in that regard and that it merely made a statement of intent which did not provide for any sanction."
Keywords:
binding character; coordinated organisations; enforcement; executive body; law of european communities; proposal; rule of another organisation; statement of intent;
Considerations
Extract:
"The complaints are seeking to have quashed decisions whereby the Administrative Council [...] refused to revise the application to them of the staff pension scheme [...]. Thus what are being impugned are individual decisions, even though they are based entirely on a decision of a general character affecting all staff members."
Keywords:
adjustment; application for quashing; competence of tribunal; decision; executive body; general decision; individual decision; pension; pension adjustment system; receivability of the complaint; refusal;
Judgment 277
37th Session, 1976
International Patent Institute
Extracts: EN,
FR
Full Judgment Text: EN,
FR
Consideration 2
Extract:
The statement merely says that the Council has adopted a series of proposals the purpose of which is to bring the salary scales and related benefits in line with those applicable in the European Communities. "That is a mere statement of intent which did not imply any firm undertaking by the Institute and which consequently did not create rights upon which the staff may rely. Hence the complainant cannot rely upon that statement to support his claim to entitlement under the provisions applicable to the staff of the European Communities."
Keywords:
binding character; enforcement; executive body; law of european communities; pension; proposal; right; rule of another organisation; salary; statement of intent;
Judgment 209
30th Session, 1973
International Telecommunication Union
Extracts: EN,
FR
Full Judgment Text: EN,
FR
Considerations
Extract:
The decisions taken by the executive authorities of the organisation in application of the resolution of its legislative body were explicitly approved by the latter and may not now be contested in law.
Keywords:
competence of tribunal; decision; enforcement; executive body; international instrument;
Judgment 118
19th Session, 1968
International Labour Organization
Extracts: EN,
FR
Full Judgment Text: EN,
FR
Consideration 1
Extract:
"On the submissions impugning the refusal of the Director-General [...] to submit to the Governing Body, for reference to the International Court of Justice, the question of the 'legal validity' of Judgment No. 96 of the Administrative Tribunal: the Administrative Tribunal is not competent to receive submissions of this nature."
Reference(s)
ILOAT Judgment(s): 96
Keywords:
advisory opinion of icj; competence of tribunal; executive body; executive head; icj; refusal; request by a party;
Judgment 83
14th Session, 1965
International Labour Organization
Extracts: EN,
FR
Full Judgment Text: EN,
FR
Considerations 2-3
Extract:
It follows from Article XII of the Statute of the Tribunal "that the possibility of submitting the question of the validity of the decision given by the Tribunal to the International Court of Justice is exclusively vested in the governing body of [the Organisation] or the administrative board of the pensions fund, as is borne out by the court itself (advisory opinion dated 23 October 1956, ICJ reports, 1956, page 77 and pages 84-85). Such a possibility is open in the sole interest of the organisation [...]. Moreover, the exercise of this right must inevitably lead the governing body to take a stand on the validity of judgments rendered by the Administrative Tribunal."
Reference(s)
ILOAT reference: ARTICLE XII OF THE STATUTE
Keywords:
advisory opinion of icj; competence; executive body; icj; organisation's interest; request by a party; unjspf;
< previous | 1, 2, 3
|
|
|
|
|
