|
![](/webcommon/s-images/empty.gif) |
![](/webcommon/s-images/empty.gif) |
![](/webcommon/s-images/empty.gif) |
Elements (609,-666)
You searched for:
Keywords: Elements
Total judgments found: 48
< previous | 1, 2, 3
Judgment 221
31st Session, 1973
World Health Organization
Extracts: EN,
FR
Full Judgment Text: EN,
FR
Consideration 1
Extract:
"In the course of proceedings that lead to a final decision various claims and arguments may be put forward and resisted; except insofar as they form part of the final decision the Tribunal has no power to adjudicate upon them."
Keywords:
claim; competence of tribunal; decision; elements; receivability of the complaint;
Judgment 182
27th Session, 1971
World Health Organization
Extracts: EN,
FR
Full Judgment Text: EN,
FR
Consideration 3
Extract:
"The Tribunal will not normally entertain complaints about the contents of appraisal reports [...] but in the circumstances of this case the Tribunal feels bound to conclude that the words complained of were inserted in the report under a total misconception of the situation and that justice requires that they should be expunged."
Keywords:
application for quashing; elements; judicial review; mistaken conclusion; performance report; rebuttal; work appraisal;
Judgment 166
25th Session, 1970
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Extracts: EN,
FR
Full Judgment Text: EN,
FR
Considerations
Extract:
"[I]n selecting an official for a vacant post the Director-General must base his decision not on a single criterion but on several considerations, such as occupational skill, length of service, experience, diligence, and suitability for performing the functions of an international official, which he must weigh individually in each case before arriving at a decision."
Keywords:
appointment; competition; discretion; elements; fitness for international civil service; qualifications; vacancy; work appraisal;
Judgment 131
21st Session, 1969
World Health Organization
Extracts: EN,
FR
Full Judgment Text: EN,
FR
Consideration 2
Extract:
"There is no provision in the Staff Regulations or Rules conferring on the complainant any right in respect of the documents in the organization's file concerning him. He is not entitled to require either that they should be withdrawn or that copies of them should be furnished to him. The submissions on these matters are therefore unfounded."
Keywords:
application for quashing; competence of tribunal; complainant; confidential evidence; disclosure of evidence; elements; personal file; request by a party;
Judgment 122
20th Session, 1968
Universal Postal Union
Extracts: EN,
FR
Full Judgment Text: EN,
FR
On the substance
Extract:
In determining whether to appoint an employee to a permanent post, the relevant body must take into account, inter alia, both the employee's professional qualifications and "his suitability as an international official from the standpoint of morality, integrity and character."
Keywords:
condition; definition; elements; fitness for international civil service; qualifications; titularization;
Judgment 97
17th Session, 1967
International Labour Organization
Extracts: EN,
FR
Full Judgment Text: EN,
FR
Consideration 1
Extract:
Designated passages in the complainant's statement "are totally unnecessary to support the complaint and are merely insulting towards the [organisation]; the Tribunal must, therefore, order their deletion."
Keywords:
complaint; elements; vexatious complaint;
Judgment 65
11th Session, 1962
World Health Organization
Extracts: EN,
FR
Full Judgment Text: EN,
FR
Consideration 5
Extract:
For the purpose of administrative decisions taken on the basis of and relating solely to a given reporting period, "there may be doubt as to whether an incident occurring prior to a given reporting period can be validly relied on in support of an evaluation of work and conduct during the reporting period, except insofar as it may be related to further events occurring within the reporting period."
Keywords:
decision; elements; performance report; period;
Judgment 59
10th Session, 1962
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Extracts: EN,
FR
Full Judgment Text: EN,
FR
Consideration 1
Extract:
"The complainant's letter [...] contained neither the grounds of his proposed claim nor any indication of the arguments upon which he proposed to support it, and cannot be accepted by the Tribunal as being a complaint fulfilling the requirements of Article VII, paragraph 2, of the Statute of the Tribunal."
Reference(s)
ILOAT reference: ARTICLE VII, PARAGRAPH 2, OF THE STATUTE
Keywords:
complaint; elements; formal requirements; receivability of the complaint;
< previous | 1, 2, 3
|
|
|
![](/webcommon/s-images/empty.gif) |
![](/webcommon/s-images/empty.gif) |