L'OIT est une institution spécialisée des Nations-Unies

Plan du site \| Contact	English

	> Page d'accueil > Triblex: base de données sur la jurisprudence > Par mots-clés du th�saurus

Charge de la preuve (148,-666)

Votre recherche:
Mots-clés: Charge de la preuve
Jugements trouvés: 245

1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 | suivant >

Jugement 4901

138e session, 2024
Organisation europ�enne pour la recherche nucl�aire
Extraits: EN, FR
Texte Int�gral Du Jugement: EN, FR
Synth�se: The complainant challenges his performance evaluation for 2018 rating such performance as �fair�.

Consid�rant 18

Extrait:

The Tribunal�s case law has often emphasized that a staff member alleging abuse of authority bears the burden of establishing the improper purposes for which the authority was exercised (see, for example, Judgments 4618, consideration 10, 4382, consideration 13, and 4146, consideration 10).

R�f�rence(s)

Jugement(s) TAOIT: 4146, 4382, 4618

Mots-clés:

Abus de pouvoir; Charge de la preuve;
Jugement 4897

138e session, 2024
Organisation europ�enne des brevets
Extraits: EN, FR
Texte Int�gral Du Jugement: EN, FR
Synth�se: La requ�rante conteste son rapport d��valuation pour l�ann�e 2018.

Consid�rant 10

Extrait:

[E]n vertu d�une jurisprudence constante du Tribunal, la mauvaise foi ne se pr�sume pas et ne peut, en cons�quence, �tre retenue que si la preuve en est rapport�e au dossier (voir, par exemple, les jugements 4675, au consid�rant 6, 4333, au consid�rant 15, 4161, au consid�rant 9, 3902, au consid�rant 11, ou 2800, au consid�rant 21).

R�f�rence(s)

Jugement(s) TAOIT: 2800, 3902, 4161, 4333, 4675

Mots-clés:

Charge de la preuve; Mauvaise foi;
Jugement 4893

138e session, 2024
Organisation europ�enne des brevets
Extraits: EN, FR
Texte Int�gral Du Jugement: EN, FR
Synth�se: The complainant challenges his staff report for 2008-2009.

Consid�rant 8

Extrait:

More recent case law of the Tribunal makes it clear that moral damages are not awarded when not substantiated. Moral damages arise from moral injury. It is necessary for a complainant to establish evidence of the injury suffered, of the alleged unlawful act adversely affecting her or him, and of the causal link between the unlawful act and the injury (see Judgments 4637, consideration 19, 4158, consideration 7, 4157, consideration 9, and 4156, considerations 5 and 6). In the present case, the complainant does not demonstrate with persuasive evidence that any of the events for which he expressly or impliedly seeks moral damages caused him moral injury, let alone demonstrates a causal link between the alleged unlawful act adversely affecting him and the damage suffered. Accordingly, his various claims for moral damages must be rejected.

R�f�rence(s)

Jugement(s) TAOIT: 4156, 4157, 4158, 4637

Mots-clés:

Charge de la preuve; Tort moral;
Jugement 4892

138e session, 2024
Organisation europ�enne des brevets
Extraits: EN, FR
Texte Int�gral Du Jugement: EN, FR
Synth�se: The complainant challenges her staff report for 2008-2009 and the decision not to initiate a harassment procedure against her reporting officer.

Consid�rant 6

Extrait:

The third subheading referred to earlier is that �[s]landerous/libellous comments have been disseminated about me�. This is a contention concerning the conduct of Mr T.E. The only relevance of this plea in relation to the staff report would be if the complainant was able to establish that Mr T.E. had been actuated by bias or ill will towards her which infected his assessment of her performance. In the main, the evidence relied upon by the complainant concerns matters of detail including comments to which she takes exception or comments that she views as contradictory, but nonetheless views as proof of bias or ill will. None of the evidence, either in isolation or in aggregate, demonstrates bias or ill will on the part of Mr T.E. in the preparation of the report, which was also the considered conclusion of the Appeals Committee�s majority. While the Tribunal acknowledges the difficulty in proving bias or ill will (see, for example, Judgments 2318, consideration 4, and 2259, consideration 13), nonetheless the burden of doing so falls on the complainant (see Judgments 4745, consideration 12, and 4010, consideration 9). In these proceedings, she has failed to do so.

R�f�rence(s)

Jugement(s) TAOIT: 2259, 2318, 4010, 4745

Mots-clés:

Charge de la preuve; Notation; Partialit�; Rapport d'appr�ciation;
Jugement 4891

138e session, 2024
Organisation europ�enne des brevets
Extraits: EN, FR
Texte Int�gral Du Jugement: EN, FR
Synth�se: The complainant challenges his staff report for 2004-2005.

Consid�rant 12

Extrait:

With respect to his third argument to the effect that there was an absence of objective evaluation since the staff report included subjective, arbitrary and personal elements going beyond the reporting officer�s discretionary power, the complainant has simply not discharged his burden of providing evidence of sufficient quality and weight to persuade the Tribunal that his allegations of bias or partiality were well founded (see, for example, Judgments 4713, consideration 12, 4543, consideration 8, and 3380, consideration 9). The complainant cannot point to any precise indication of bias within the staff report. The comments of the reporting officer indeed point in the opposite direction and include many that praised the complainant�s performance when appropriate.

R�f�rence(s)

Jugement(s) TAOIT: 3380, 4543, 4713

Mots-clés:

Charge de la preuve; Partialit�;

Consid�rant 17

Extrait:

The Tribunal has long recognized that �international civil servants are entitled to expect that their cases will be considered by internal appeal bodies within a reasonable timeframe and that failure to comply with this requirement of expeditious proceedings constitutes a failing on the part of the employer organisation� (see Judgments 4655, consideration 21, 3510, consideration 24, and 2116, consideration 11). An organisation is indeed expected to process internal appeals with the requisite promptness and diligence, and it has a positive obligation to see to it that such procedures move forward with reasonable speed (see, for example, Judgments 4173, consideration 12, and 3755, consideration 15).
Under the Tribunal�s case law, the amount of compensation for unreasonable delay is ordinarily influenced by two considerations, one being the length of the delay and the other the effect of the delay (see, for example, Judgments 4655, consideration 21, and 3160, consideration 17). In Judgment 4799, consideration 7, the Tribunal recalled that its recent case law holds that an unreasonable delay in an internal appeal is not sufficient in itself to award moral damages. The complainant must also articulate the adverse effects which the delay has caused (see also Judgment 4563, consideration 14). Furthermore, the Tribunal has regularly stated that, in terms of damages, a complainant seeking compensation must provide clear evidence of the alleged unlawful act, of the injury suffered and of the causal link between the unlawful act and the injury, and that she or he bears the burden of proof in this regard (see Judgments 4556, consideration 12, 4158, consideration 4, 4157, consideration 7, and 4156, consideration 5).
However, the complainant has failed to provide any persuasive evidence of the moral injury stemming from the delay notwithstanding it was over five years and was unreasonable.

R�f�rence(s)

Jugement(s) TAOIT: 2116, 3160, 3510, 3755, 4157, 4158, 4173, 4556, 4563, 4655, 4799

Mots-clés:

Charge de la preuve; Retard dans la proc�dure interne; Tort moral;
Jugement 4890

138e session, 2024
Organisation europ�enne des brevets
Extraits: EN, FR
Texte Int�gral Du Jugement: EN, FR
Synth�se: The complainant challenges his staff report for 2004-2005.

Consid�rant 13

Extrait:

Turning to the moral damages claimed by the complainant, the Tribunal observes that they are limited to the impact of the undue delay in handling the internal appeal process. [�]
But the Tribunal�s case law has recognized that the amount of compensation for unreasonable delay is ordinarily influenced by two considerations, one being the length of the delay and the other the effect of the delay (see, for example, Judgments 4655, consideration 21, and 3160, consideration 17). In Judgment 4799, consideration 7, the Tribunal recalled that its recent case law holds that an unreasonable delay in an internal appeal is not sufficient in itself to award moral damages. The complainant must also articulate the adverse effects which the delay has caused (see also Judgment 4563, consideration 14). Furthermore, the Tribunal has regularly stated that, in terms of damages, a complainant seeking compensation must provide clear evidence of the alleged unlawful act, of the injury suffered and of the causal link between the unlawful act and the injury, and that she or he bears the burden of proof in this regard (see Judgments 4556, consideration 12, 4158, consideration 4, 4157, consideration 7, and 4156, consideration 5).
The complainant has not discharged this burden in the present case. The evidence of any injury suffered in terms of moral damages or of the detrimental effect of the delay on his situation is barely articulated, if at all, in his submissions. He is therefore not entitled to any compensation in this regard.

R�f�rence(s)

Jugement(s) TAOIT: 3160, 4156, 4157, 4158, 4556, 4563, 4655, 4799

Mots-clés:

Charge de la preuve; Retard dans la proc�dure interne; Tort moral;

Consid�rant 12

Extrait:

The complainant bears the burden to provide evidence of sufficient quality and weight to persuade the Tribunal that his allegations of bias are well founded (see, for example, Judgments 4713, consideration 12, 4543, consideration 8, and 3380, consideration 9).

R�f�rence(s)

Jugement(s) TAOIT: 3380, 4543, 4713

Mots-clés:

Charge de la preuve; Partialit�;
Jugement 4886

138e session, 2024
Organisation des Nations Unies pour l'�ducation, la science et la culture
Extraits: EN, FR
Texte Int�gral Du Jugement: EN, FR
Synth�se: Le requ�rant conteste l�ajournement de sa demande d�habilitation au port d�une arme de service.

Consid�rant 7

Extrait:

Le requ�rant demande que l�UNESCO soit condamn�e � lui verser des dommages-int�r�ts � raison de la dur�e excessive de la proc�dure de recours interne.
La conclusion formul�e � cette fin doit, par exception � ce qui vient d��tre dit, �tre ici examin�e, car les fonctionnaires internationaux sont, par principe, en droit d�attendre que leur cause soit trait�e par les organes de recours interne dans un d�lai raisonnable (voir, par exemple, les jugements 3510, au consid�rant 24, ou 2116, au consid�rant 11). La m�connaissance de cette exigence de c�l�rit�, si elle pr�sente un caract�re fautif, justifie une r�paration, dont, selon la jurisprudence du Tribunal, le montant d�pend alors ordinairement de deux facteurs essentiels, qui sont la dur�e du retard constat� et les cons�quences de ce retard pour le fonctionnaire int�ress� (voir, par exemple, les jugements 4178, au consid�rant 15, 4100, au consid�rant 7, ou 3160, au consid�rant 17).
En l�esp�ce, le d�lai de pr�s de quatre ans qui s�est �coul� entre l�introduction du premier recours devant le Conseil d�appel, le 3 avril 2018, et l�intervention de la d�cision d�finitive du 14 mars 2022 rev�t, dans l�absolu, un caract�re manifestement excessif.
Mais, d�une part, le Tribunal rel�ve que le requ�rant, qui a sollicit� du Conseil d�appel, � trois reprises, des prolongations de d�lai de production de ses �critures, d�une dur�e cumul�e de neuf mois, est ainsi lui-m�me � l�origine d�une partie du retard constat� dans la proc�dure et qu�il peut en outre appara�tre l�gitime, eu �gard aux prolongations ainsi obtenues par l�int�ress�, que l�Organisation s�en soit �galement vu accorder de son c�t�. D�autre part, la d�fenderesse expose, de fa�on convaincante aux yeux du Tribunal, que le fonctionnement du Conseil d�appel s�est trouv� consid�rablement perturb�, en 2020 et 2021, par les confinements successifs ordonn�s par les autorit�s fran�aises du fait de la pand�mie de Covid-19, qui ont notamment affect� la possibilit� pour cet organe de tenir normalement ses audiences. Enfin, il importe de souligner que, compte tenu de l�abandon du processus d�armement des agents de s�ret� � la suite du d�p�t du rapport de l�IOS d�octobre 2018, les recours internes form�s par le requ�rant avaient perdu leur objet peu apr�s leur introduction, de sorte que le retard de la proc�dure n��tait pas de nature � causer � celui-ci un tort moral substantiel (voir notamment, sur ce point, les jugements 4727, au consid�rant 14, et 4635, au consid�rant 8).
D�s lors, le Tribunal estime que, dans les circonstances particuli�res de l�esp�ce, il ne se justifie pas de condamner l�UNESCO � verser une indemnit� � l�int�ress� de ce chef.

R�f�rence(s)

Jugement(s) TAOIT: 2116, 3160, 3510, 4100, 4178, 4635, 4727

Mots-clés:

Charge de la preuve; Proc�dure interne; Retard; Tort moral;
Jugement 4879

138e session, 2024
Organisation des Nations Unies pour l'�ducation, la science et la culture
Extraits: EN, FR
Texte Int�gral Du Jugement: EN, FR
Synth�se: Le requ�rant conteste l�ajournement de sa demande d�habilitation au port d�une arme de service.

Consid�rant 6

Extrait:

Selon la jurisprudence du Tribunal, l�ill�galit� d�une d�cision n�ouvre droit � une indemnit� pour tort moral au profit du fonctionnaire concern� que si cette d�cision lui a caus� un tort plus grave que celui r�sultant de cette ill�galit� en elle-m�me (voir notamment les jugements 4156, au consid�rant 5, et 1380, au consid�rant 11).
En l�esp�ce, et compte tenu du fait que la d�cision contest�e n�a eu aucun effet concret, le Tribunal estime que les �ventuels vices entachant cette d�cision ne seraient pas de nature, en tout �tat de cause, � avoir occasionn� au requ�rant un tel tort particulier.
Il n�en irait diff�remment que si l�int�ress� �tablissait que l�ajournement de sa demande d�habilitation avait proc�d�, comme il le soutient, d�un parti pris malveillant � son encontre s�inscrivant dans le cadre d�un harc�lement moral et de mesures de repr�sailles qu�il impute au chef de la Section de la s�curit� et de la s�ret�.

R�f�rence(s)

Jugement(s) TAOIT: 1380, 4156

Mots-clés:

Charge de la preuve; Tort moral;
Jugement 4867

138e session, 2024
Organisation mondiale de la sant�
Extraits: EN, FR
Texte Int�gral Du Jugement: EN, FR
Synth�se: The complainant contests the determination of her leave status during her absence from work as well as the decision, taken as a result of her internal appeal, not to award her moral damages and to grant her up to 2,500 Swiss francs in legal costs.

Consid�rant 5

Extrait:

Bias and abuse of authority must be proven and the complainant bears the burden of proof (see Judgment 4688, consideration 10, and the case law cited therein).

R�f�rence(s)

Jugement(s) TAOIT: 4688

Mots-clés:

Abus de pouvoir; Charge de la preuve; Partialit�;

Consid�rant 5

Extrait:

The complainant alleges retaliation, but her allegation is generic and unsubstantiated. A mere assumption or suspicion of retaliation does not meet the requisite standard of proof, the onus of which is borne by the complainant (see Judgments 4391, consideration 13, and 4363, consideration 12).

R�f�rence(s)

Jugement(s) TAOIT: 4363, 4391

Mots-clés:

Charge de la preuve; Repr�sailles;

Consid�rant 6

Extrait:

[M]oral prejudice, which includes, inter alia, emotional distress, anxiety, stress, anguish and hardship (see Judgment 4644, consideration 7) must be proven, and the complainant bears the burden of proof. The complainant has not established to the Tribunal�s satisfaction a causal link between the Organization�s conduct and her suffering.

R�f�rence(s)

Jugement(s) TAOIT: 4644

Mots-clés:

Charge de la preuve; Indemnit� pour tort moral;
Jugement 4857

138e session, 2024
Organisation des Nations Unies pour l'alimentation et l'agriculture
Extraits: EN, FR
Texte Int�gral Du Jugement: EN, FR
Synth�se: Le requ�rant soutient que l�Organisation serait responsable de fautes lourdes ayant port� atteinte � ses droits et estime notamment avoir �t� victime de harc�lement.

Consid�rant 8

Extrait:

[L]e Tribunal est, comme il l�a toujours soulign� depuis l�origine m�me de sa jurisprudence, une juridiction d�attribution et qu�il est, � ce titre, �imp�rativement tenu par les dispositions statutaires qui ont d�termin� sa comp�tence� (voir le jugement 67, au consid�rant 3, cit� notamment dans les jugements 4540, au consid�rant 4, 4458, au consid�rant 12, et 2657, au consid�rant 5). Il en r�sulte que le Tribunal ne saurait statuer sur une requ�te introduite devant lui si sa comp�tence pour en conna�tre n�est pas clairement �tablie.
C�est bien entendu � l�auteur d�une telle requ�te qu�il incombe, en principe, d��tablir cette comp�tence et il en d�coule notamment qu�il appartient � un requ�rant revendiquant le statut de fonctionnaire d�une organisation internationale de produire, afin de justifier de cette qualit�, le contrat le liant � celle-ci (voir les jugements 2503, au consid�rant 4, 1964, au consid�rant 3, et 339, au consid�rant 1).

R�f�rence(s)

Jugement(s) TAOIT: 67, 339, 1964, 2503, 2657, 4458, 4540

Mots-clés:

Charge de la preuve; Comp�tence d'attribution;
Jugement 4856

138e session, 2024
Organisation des Nations Unies pour l'alimentation et l'agriculture
Extraits: EN, FR
Texte Int�gral Du Jugement: EN, FR
Synth�se: The complainant impugns the decision to dismiss him for misconduct.

Consid�rant 3

Extrait:

As this complaint challenges a disciplinary decision, the Tribunal recalls its settled case law, that the burden of proof in such cases rests on an organization to prove the underlying allegations beyond a reasonable doubt before a disciplinary sanction can be imposed (see, for example, Judgment 3649, consideration 14).

R�f�rence(s)

Jugement(s) TAOIT: 3649

Mots-clés:

Au-del� de tout doute raisonnable; Charge de la preuve; Niveau de preuve; Sanction disciplinaire;
Jugement 4855

138e session, 2024
Organisation des Nations Unies pour l'alimentation et l'agriculture
Extraits: EN, FR
Texte Int�gral Du Jugement: EN, FR
Synth�se: The complainant challenges the appointment of another official to the position of Deputy Director, Investment Centre Division, following a competition.

Consid�rant 18

Extrait:

Insofar as the complainant alleges that his non-selection was motivated by bad faith, prejudice and discrimination, this has not been proven and cannot be presumed (see Judgment 4352, consideration 17, and the case law cited therein). It is to be recalled that the ultimate decision to appoint Mr P. was based on the recommendation of the Interview Panel and it would be necessary for the complainant to have established, in these proceedings, that its consideration and recommendation was infected by bias, prejudice or discrimination of the type alleged against the Organization more generally.

R�f�rence(s)

Jugement(s) TAOIT: 4352

Mots-clés:

Charge de la preuve; Comit� de s�lection; Concours; Discrimination; Mauvaise foi; Partialit�; Proc�dure de s�lection; Pr�judice; Recommandation;
Jugement 4854

138e session, 2024
Organisation des Nations Unies pour l'alimentation et l'agriculture
Extraits: EN, FR
Texte Int�gral Du Jugement: EN, FR
Synth�se: The complainant challenges the appointment of another official to the position of Director, Office of Strategy, Planning and Resources Management, following a competitive selection process.

Consid�rant 18

Extrait:

Insofar as the complainant alleges that his non-selection was motivated by bad faith, prejudice and discrimination, this has not been proven and cannot be presumed (see Judgment 4352, consideration 17, and the case law cited therein). It is to be recalled that the ultimate decision to appoint Ms C. was based on the recommendation of the Interview Panel and it would be necessary for the complainant to have established, in these proceedings, that its consideration and recommendation was infected by bias, prejudice or discrimination of the type alleged against the Organization more generally.

R�f�rence(s)

Jugement(s) TAOIT: 4352

Mots-clés:

Charge de la preuve; Comit� de s�lection; Concours; Discrimination; Mauvaise foi; Proc�dure de s�lection; Pr�judice; Recommandation;
Jugement 4852

138e session, 2024
Organisation des Nations Unies pour l'alimentation et l'agriculture
Extraits: EN, FR
Texte Int�gral Du Jugement: EN, FR
Synth�se: The complainant challenges the appointment, by lateral transfer, of another official to the position of Director, FAO Liaison Office in Geneva.

Consid�rants 12, 14-15

Extrait:

What the complainant is arguing is, in substance, that in appointing Ms R.B. the Director-General was making a choice between her and the complainant (and perhaps others), and the failure to choose him was infected by, amongst other things, bias and prejudice towards him. The difficulty with this argument is that there is no direct evidence that such a choice was being made nor can an inference reasonably be drawn that it was.
[�]
As the Tribunal observed in Judgment 4690, consideration 13, when addressing the statement made by the Tribunal in Judgment 3669, consideration 12, and similar cases regarding the reliance on earlier evidence of bias and prejudice to prove the true character of alleged bias and prejudice in later conduct:
�There is probably no overarching principle which will determine the admissibility of evidence concerning earlier events in every case. At least in a case such as the present, the question of admissibility should be determined by reference to the specific facts of the case.�
In this case, the evidence of the complainant and the arguments based on it about prior bias and prejudice is not, in the circumstances, relevant to the legality of the decision to transfer Ms R.B. There was no choice being made of the type on which the complainant�s arguments rely. Accordingly, much of the argument of the complainant is not founded and lacks any admissible evidentiary underpinning.

R�f�rence(s)

Jugement(s) TAOIT: 3669, 4690

Mots-clés:

Charge de la preuve; Nomination sans concours; Partialit�; Preuve; Pr�judice;
Jugement 4850

138e session, 2024
Organisation mondiale de la propri�t� intellectuelle
Extraits: EN, FR
Texte Int�gral Du Jugement: EN, FR
Synth�se: The complainant contests the decision to terminate his fixed-term appointment for reasons of health.

Consid�rant 4

Extrait:

[T]he Appeals Board carefully analysed, in detail and over several pages, the evidence concerning the factual question of whether there had been notification to the complainant. It observed, correctly, that the burden of proof that notification had been given fell on the person who sent the document, in this case the Organization, citing Judgment 3871, consideration 9. Its analysis and conclusion that the Organization had not proved that notification had been given is unexceptionable and certainly does not reveal a manifest error. In the impugned decision of 23 August 2021, the Director General accepted the pivotal significance of the factual question about notification. [�] [The Director General] challenged the reasoning of the Appeal Board. But, in the face of that reasoning, his analysis is unpersuasive.

R�f�rence(s)

Jugement(s) TAOIT: 3871

Mots-clés:

Avis m�dical; Charge de la preuve; Chef ex�cutif; Notification; Preuve;

Consid�rant 9

Extrait:

The Tribunal is satisfied the complainant suffered a moral injury as a result of being denied the right of review of the medical assessment leading directly to the termination of his employment, effective 1 October 2018. He is entitled to moral damages which are assessed in the sum of 10,000 Swiss francs.

Mots-clés:

Avis m�dical; Charge de la preuve; Indemnit� pour tort moral; Notification; Obligation d'information; Perte de chance; R�siliation d'engagement pour raisons de sant�;

Mots-cl�s du jugement

Mots-clés:

Admission partielle; Avis m�dical; Charge de la preuve; Devoir de sollicitude; D�lai p�remptoire; Notification; Obligation d'information; Perte de chance; Requ�te admise; R�siliation d'engagement pour raisons de sant�;
Jugement 4849

138e session, 2024
Organisation mondiale de la propri�t� intellectuelle
Extraits: EN, FR
Texte Int�gral Du Jugement: EN, FR
Synth�se: The complainant contests the decision not to convert his fixed-term appointment into a continuing or permanent appointment.

Consid�rant 10

Extrait:

The second contention is based on a premise that there was a practice that a staff member on a fixed-term contract would, at the end of their fifth year of appointment, be offered the choice of having their contract converted into a continuing appointment at that point, or wait a further two years before having their contract converted into a permanent appointment. The complainant contends his treatment did not accord with this practice and involved unequal treatment. But again, in the main, the complainant supports the existence of this practice, and its breach, by generalised assertions, though he does descend into some specifics. However, the Tribunal�s case law requires that �allegations of discrimination and unequal treatment can lead to redress on condition that they are based on precise and proven facts� (see, for example, Judgment 4238, consideration 5). The concept of �precise and proven facts� entails sufficiently detailed and persuasive evidence to establish that there had been unequal treatment.

R�f�rence(s)

Jugement(s) TAOIT: 4238

Mots-clés:

Charge de la preuve; Dur�e du contrat; Dur�e ind�termin�e; In�galit� de traitement; Pratique; Preuve; Prolongation de contrat; Renouvellement de contrat;

Consid�rant 9

Extrait:

Fundamental to the first contention is the fact that the decision, as explained by the complainant in his pleas, �was based on the personal prejudice which perniciously lay hidden behind the unlawful initiation of the unlawful investigation process against [him]�. This is a reference to the investigation leading to the laying of charges of misconduct against the complainant on 14 December 2016. This is tantamount to a claim of bad faith which must be proven and cannot be presumed (see, for example, Judgment 4753, consideration 13). But beyond generalised assertions, the complainant provides no persuasive evidence which directly, or inferentially, establishes personal prejudice of the type relied on.

R�f�rence(s)

Jugement(s) TAOIT: 4753

Mots-clés:

Charge de la preuve; Mauvaise foi; Parti pris; Partialit�; Preuve;

Consid�rant 11

Extrait:

Cases can arise where an inference can be drawn that an alleged practice does exist, largely because of the refusal or failure of the organisation to provide documents requested by a complainant intended to prove the existence of that practice. One example, relied on by the complainant, was Judgment 3415, particularly considerations 6 to 9. In the present case, the complainant recounts his unsuccessful attempts to obtain, during the processes internal to the organisation, documentation intended to prove the existence of the practice. However, what he has failed to do in these proceedings before the Tribunal is exercise, if necessary, his ability under the Tribunal�s Rules, specifically under Article 9, paragraph 6, to secure documents from WIPO which would prove, in an evidentiary sense, the existence of the practice he asserts. The inference drawn in Judgment 3415 was substantially based on the refusal of the defendant organisation to produce the discovery documents requested by the complaint in the proceedings before the Tribunal. In that matter, the Tribunal made it clear that the defendant organisation should have, in the face of the discovery request, produced the documents. In the present case, the absence of a request or, ultimately if necessary, procuring an order under Article 9, paragraph 6, militates against drawing an inference that the asserted practice existed.

R�f�rence(s)

Jugement(s) TAOIT: 3415

Mots-clés:

Charge de la preuve; Dur�e ind�termin�e; Pratique; Preuve; Production des preuves; Prolongation de contrat; Renouvellement de contrat;
Jugement 4848

138e session, 2024
Organisation mondiale de la propri�t� intellectuelle
Extraits: EN, FR
Texte Int�gral Du Jugement: EN, FR
Synth�se: The complainant contests WIPO�s decisions (i) to advertise his post; (ii) to organise a selection process to fill his post; (iii) not to appoint him to the post without competition; (iv) to renew his fixed-term appointment for three months only; (v) to restructure his division; and (vi) to modify/redefine his post.

Consid�rant 8

Extrait:

The other and related decisions apparent from the letter of 31 January 2018 were the decisions to offer the complainant a three-month extension of his fixed-term appointment and to advertise the position of Director of the (about to be created) CMD. In his pleas, the complainant challenges the creation of this position contending, amongst other things, it was not materially different to the position he then formally occupied and was the product of a reorganisation which was illusory rather than substantial. It is unnecessary to repeat the various ways this is put by the complainant. However, mention should be made of a submission, which is tantamount to an allegation that the reorganisation was not a bona fide exercise of an undoubtedly wide discretionary power the executive head of an international organisation has to institute administrative and other structural changes within the organisation with consequential effects on existing posts, including their redefinition or abolition (see, for example, Judgments 4599, considerations 11 and 12, 4353, consideration 7, 3238, consideration 7, and 3169, consideration 7). This is, in substance, an allegation of bad faith. However, bad faith may not be presumed, and the burden of proof is on the party that pleads it (see Judgments 4682, consideration 3, 4353, consideration 12, and 2800, consideration 21). In the present case, there is not a scintilla of evidence that the reorganisation decision did not involve a bona fide exercise of the wide discretionary power of the executive head. This plea is unfounded.

R�f�rence(s)

Jugement(s) TAOIT: 2800, 3169, 3238, 4353, 4599, 4682

Mots-clés:

Charge de la preuve; Description de poste; Diff�rence; Dur�e du contrat; Dur�e d�termin�e; Mauvaise foi; Pouvoir d'appr�ciation; Prolongation de contrat; Renouvellement de contrat; R�organisation; Suppression de poste; Titre du poste;
Jugement 4842

138e session, 2024
Organisation internationale de police criminelle
Extraits: EN, FR
Texte Int�gral Du Jugement: EN, FR
Synth�se: La requ�rante conteste l�application � son traitement de la nouvelle grille de traitements pour 2018.

Consid�rant 4

Extrait:

[L]e Tribunal rappelle qu�il est de jurisprudence constante que la charge de la preuve d�un manque d�impartialit� d�un ou de plusieurs membres d�un organe de recours interne incombe � tout requ�rant. Or, en l�esp�ce, l�int�ress�e n�apporte manifestement pas la preuve qui lui incombe � cet �gard, �tant donn� que de simples soup�ons et des all�gations non �tay�es par une preuve tangible ne suffisent pas � �tablir un manque d�impartialit� de tout ou partie des membres de la Commission mixte de recours (voir, par exemple, les jugements 4662, au consid�rant 13, et 4553, au consid�rant 7).

R�f�rence(s)

Jugement(s) TAOIT: 4553, 4662

Mots-clés:

Charge de la preuve; Impartialit�; Organe de recours interne;
Jugement 4841

138e session, 2024
Organisation internationale pour les migrations
Extraits: EN, FR
Texte Int�gral Du Jugement: EN, FR
Synth�se: The complainant challenges the decisions to abolish the post she used to hold and not to renew her contract beyond 31 December 2020.

Consid�rant 5

Extrait:

The Tribunal notes that bias, prejudice, and bad faith cannot be presumed, they must be proven and the complainant bears the burden of proof (see Judgment 4688, consideration 10, and the case law cited therein). Although evidence of personal prejudice is often concealed and such prejudice must be inferred from surrounding circumstances, that does not relieve complainants, who bear the burden of proving their allegations, from introducing evidence of sufficient quality and weight to persuade the Tribunal. Mere suspicion and unsupported allegations are clearly not enough, the less so where, as here, the actions of the organization, which are alleged to have been tainted by personal prejudice, are shown to have a verifiable objective justification (see Judgment 4745, consideration 12).

R�f�rence(s)

Jugement(s) TAOIT: 4688, 4745

Mots-clés:

Charge de la preuve; Mauvaise foi; Partialit�; Pr�judice;
Jugement 4840

138e session, 2024
Organisation internationale pour les migrations
Extraits: EN, FR
Texte Int�gral Du Jugement: EN, FR
Synth�se: The complainant contests the decision not to renew her fixed-term contract due to underperformance after placing her on a three-month Performance Improvement Plan.

Consid�rant 34

Extrait:

[T]he complainant claims material damages in an amount equal to two years� salary, benefits, step increases, pension contributions, and all other entitlements and emoluments that she would have received had she not been wrongfully separated from service. This claim is not substantiated in the complainant�s proceedings be it in terms of years sought or of her expectations within the Organization. Given that any fixed-term contract the complainant ever held with IOM never exceeded one year and that the total length of her services with the Organization lasted approximately five years, the Tribunal considers that this claim is not justified and overstated in the circumstances.
An award of material damages in an amount equivalent to nine months� salary, including benefits, entitlements and emoluments, represents a fair and reasonable compensation in the present case. IOM will be ordered to pay this amount to the complainant, plus interest at the rate of 5 per cent per annum from 1 November 2019, less any amounts she may have earned from other employment during that period of nine months beginning on 1 November 2019.

Mots-clés:

Application des r�gles de proc�dure; Charge de la preuve; Dommages-int�r�ts pour tort mat�riel; Dur�e d�termin�e; Non-renouvellement de contrat; Pr�judice; Violation;

Consid�rant 35

Extrait:

The complainant also claims moral damages in an amount equal to no less than one year of her former gross salary and benefits. But the Tribunal�s case law states that in respect of damages, the complainant bears the burden of proof and that she must provide evidence of the alleged injury (see, for example, Judgment 4156, consideration 5). It suffices to note that in the present situation, notwithstanding this precedent, the complainant did not provide any specification of the moral injury she allegedly suffered nor evidence supporting its existence. This claim must consequently be rejected.

R�f�rence(s)

Jugement(s) TAOIT: 4156

Mots-clés:

Application des r�gles de proc�dure; Charge de la preuve; Dur�e d�termin�e; Indemnit� pour tort moral; Non-renouvellement de contrat; Pr�judice; Violation;

1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 | suivant >

Dernière mise � jour: 24.09.2024

^ haut

Charge de la preuve (148,-666)

Jugement 4901

Consid�rant 18

Extrait:

R�f�rence(s)

Mots-clés:

Jugement 4897

Consid�rant 10

Extrait:

R�f�rence(s)

Mots-clés:

Jugement 4893

Consid�rant 8

Extrait:

R�f�rence(s)

Mots-clés:

Jugement 4892

Consid�rant 6

Extrait:

R�f�rence(s)

Mots-clés:

Jugement 4891

Consid�rant 12

Extrait:

R�f�rence(s)

Mots-clés:

Consid�rant 17

Extrait:

R�f�rence(s)

Mots-clés:

Jugement 4890

Consid�rant 13

Extrait:

R�f�rence(s)

Mots-clés:

Consid�rant 12

Extrait:

R�f�rence(s)

Mots-clés:

Jugement 4886

Consid�rant 7

Extrait:

R�f�rence(s)

Mots-clés:

Jugement 4879

Consid�rant 6

Extrait:

R�f�rence(s)

Mots-clés:

Jugement 4867

Consid�rant 5

Extrait:

R�f�rence(s)

Mots-clés:

Consid�rant 5

Extrait:

R�f�rence(s)

Mots-clés:

Consid�rant 6

Extrait:

R�f�rence(s)

Mots-clés:

Jugement 4857

Consid�rant 8

Extrait:

R�f�rence(s)

Mots-clés:

Jugement 4856

Consid�rant 3

Extrait:

R�f�rence(s)

Mots-clés:

Jugement 4855

Consid�rant 18

Extrait:

R�f�rence(s)

Mots-clés:

Jugement 4854

Consid�rant 18

Extrait: