Date of filing (772,-666)

You searched for:
Keywords: Date of filing
Total judgments found: 2

• Judgment 4087

  
  127th Session, 2019
  World Intellectual Property Organization
  Extracts: EN, FR
  Full Judgment Text: EN, FR
  Summary: The complainant challenges the validity of a competition procedure in which he took part and the lawfulness of the ensuing appointment.

  Consideration 2

  Extract:

  [...] It should be recalled that the date of filing of complaints and briefs before the Tribunal is, in principle, the date on which they are sent and not the date on which they are received by the Registry (see, for example, Judgment 3566, consideration 3). The file contains a delivery receipt showing that the reply was deposited at the International Labour Office, secretariat of the International Labour Organization, where the Tribunal is based, on 15 June 2015. As the reply was thus sent on that date at the latest, that is within the prescribed time limit, which expired that evening, the complainant is wrong to claim that it was filed late (see Judgment 3648, consideration 2).

  Reference(s)

  ILOAT Judgment(s): 3566, 3648
  

  Keywords:

  complaint; date of filing; time bar; time limit;
  

  
  
  

• Judgment 3134

  
  113th Session, 2012
  Universal Postal Union
  Extracts: EN, FR
  Full Judgment Text: EN, FR

  Consideration 5

  Extract:

  According to Article VII, paragraph 2, of the Statute of the Tribunal, a complaint must be filed within ninety days after the complainant was notified of the decision impugned. The defendant argues that the time limit appears not to have been observed and that the complaint is therefore time-barred. This objection is without foundation. According to the case law of the Tribunal (see, inter alia, Judgment 2863, under 3 ), the period of time for filing a complaint begins to run not from the day when the complainant was notified of the impugned decision, but from the following day.

  Reference(s)

  ILOAT Judgment(s): 2863
  

  Keywords:

  date of filing;