Receivability of application (838,-666)

You searched for:
Keywords: Receivability of application
Total judgments found: 6

• Judgment 4671

  
  136th Session, 2023
  International Criminal Police Organization
  Extracts: EN, FR
  Full Judgment Text: EN, FR
  Summary: The complainant seeks the restitution of amounts wrongly deducted from his salary in respect of sickness insurance contributions.

  Consideration 5

  Extract:

  As to the second objection to receivability alleging that the internal appeal lodged by the complainant was premature, the Tribunal observes that the Organization is not in any event entitled to raise that objection before it because this ground of irreceivability was not mentioned in the Secretary General’s decision of 25 August 2020.
  This last objection to receivability must therefore also be dismissed.

  Keywords:

  estoppel; receivability of application;
  

  
  
  

• Judgment 4670

  
  136th Session, 2023
  International Criminal Police Organization
  Extracts: EN, FR
  Full Judgment Text: EN, FR
  Summary: The complainant seeks the restitution of amounts wrongly deducted from her salary in respect of sickness insurance contributions.

  Consideration 6

  Extract:

  As to the third objection to receivability, alleging that the complainant’s internal appeal was premature, the Tribunal observes that the Organization is not in any event entitled to raise that objection before it because this ground of irreceivability was not mentioned in the Secretary General’s decision of 25 August 2020.

  Keywords:

  estoppel; receivability of application;
  

  
  
  

• Judgment 4096

  
  127th Session, 2019
  World Health Organization
  Extracts: EN, FR
  Full Judgment Text: EN, FR
  Summary: The complainant challenges the failure to act on his request to update his terms of reference and the subsequent failure to take interim measures to protect him from harassment and retaliation by his supervisors.

  Consideration 9

  Extract:

  The claims against the decisions concerning the abolition of the complainant’s post and his separation from service, which occurred [...] after the complainant had filed his appeal before the RBA [...], are irreceivable as they do not challenge final decisions within the meaning of Article VII, paragraph 1, of the Tribunal’s Statute.

  Keywords:

  claim; final decision; receivability of application;
  

  
  
  

• Judgment 4079

  
  127th Session, 2019
  Universal Postal Union
  Extracts: EN, FR
  Full Judgment Text: EN, FR
  Summary: The UPU filed an application for interpretation and review of Judgment 3930 and the complainant in that case filed an application for execution of that judgment.

  Consideration 9

  Extract:

  According to the Tribunal’s case law, ordinarily an application for interpretation can only concern the decision in a judgment and not the grounds therefor (see, for example, Judgment 3984, consideration 10, and the case law cited therein).

  Reference(s)

  ILOAT Judgment(s): 3984
  

  Keywords:

  application for interpretation; receivability of application;
  

  
  
  

• Judgment 4078

  
  127th Session, 2019
  Universal Postal Union
  Extracts: EN, FR
  Full Judgment Text: EN, FR
  Summary: The UPU filed an application for interpretation and review of Judgment 3929 and the complainant in that case filed an application for execution of that judgment.

  Consideration 9

  Extract:

  According to the Tribunal’s case law, ordinarily an application for interpretation can only concern the decision in a judgment and not the grounds therefor (see, for example, Judgment 3984, consideration 10, and the case law cited therein). The application for interpretation is, on the face of the record, irreceivable as it does not put in issue the terms of the orders made in the decision in Judgment 3929.

  Reference(s)

  ILOAT Judgment(s): 3929, 3984
  

  Keywords:

  application for interpretation; receivability of application;
  

  
  
  

• Judgment 4076

  
  127th Session, 2019
  Universal Postal Union
  Extracts: EN, FR
  Full Judgment Text: EN, FR
  Summary: The UPU filed and application for interpretation and review of Judgment 3927 and the complainant in that case filed an application for execution of that judgment.

  Consideration 8

  Extract:

  According to the Tribunal’s case law, ordinarily an application for interpretation can only concern the decision in a judgment and not the grounds therefor (see, for example, Judgment 3984, consideration 10, and the case law cited therein). The application for interpretation is, on the face of the record, irreceivable as it does not put in issue the terms of the orders made in the decision in Judgment 3927.

  Reference(s)

  ILOAT Judgment(s): 3927, 3984
  

  Keywords:

  application for interpretation; receivability of application;